Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rocuronium pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the adductor pollicis and masseter muscles.
Vega, E A; Ibacache, M E; Anderson, B J; Holford, N H G; Nazar, C E; Solari, S; Allende, F A; Cortínez, L I.
Afiliação
  • Vega EA; Departamento de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, PO Box: 114-D, Santiago, Chile.
  • Ibacache ME; Departamento de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, PO Box: 114-D, Santiago, Chile.
  • Anderson BJ; Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Holford NH; Department of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Nazar CE; Departamento de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, PO Box: 114-D, Santiago, Chile.
  • Solari S; Laboratorio Clínico, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Allende FA; Laboratorio Clínico, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Cortínez LI; Departamento de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, PO Box: 114-D, Santiago, Chile.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 60(6): 734-46, 2016 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899676
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the dose-effect relationship of rocuronium at the adductor pollicis and masseter muscles. METHODS: Ten, ASA I, adult patients, received a bolus dose of rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg during propofol based anesthesia. Train-of-four (TOF) was simultaneously monitored at the masseter and the adductor pollicis muscles until recovery. Rocuronium arterial serum concentrations were measured during 120 min. The first twitch of the TOF response was used to characterize the time-effect profile of both muscles using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis in NONMEM. A decrease in NONMEM objective function (∆OFV) of 3.84 points for an added parameter was considered significant at the 0.05 level. RESULTS: Onset time at the masseter (mean ± SD, 1.5 ± 0.9 min) was faster than at the adductor pollicis (2.7 ± 1.4 min, P < 0.05). Recovery, measured as the time to TOF ratio = 0.9 was similar between muscles 29.9 ± 6.7 (adductor pollicis) vs. 29.3 ± 8.1 (masseter). (P = 0.77). The estimated pharmacodynamic parameters [mean (95% CI)] of the adductor pollicis muscle and the masseter muscle were; plasma effect-site equilibration half-time (teq) 3.25 (2.34, 3.69) min vs. 2.86 (1.83, 3.29) min, (∆OFV 383.665); Ce50 of 1.24 (1.13, 1.56) mg/l vs. 1.19 (1.00, 1.21) mg/l, (∆OFV 184.284); Hill coefficient of 3.97 (3.82, 5.62) vs. 4.68 (3.83, 5.71), (∆OFV 78.906). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the masseter muscle has faster onset of blockade and similar recovery profile than adductor pollicis muscle. These findings were best, explained by a faster plasma effect-site equilibration of the masseter muscle to rocuronium.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fármacos Neuromusculares não Despolarizantes / Músculo Masseter Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Chile

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fármacos Neuromusculares não Despolarizantes / Músculo Masseter Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Chile