Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effective connectivity of brain regions underlying third-party punishment: Functional MRI and Granger causality evidence.
Bellucci, Gabriele; Chernyak, Sergey; Hoffman, Morris; Deshpande, Gopikrishna; Dal Monte, Olga; Knutson, Kristine M; Grafman, Jordan; Krueger, Frank.
Afiliação
  • Bellucci G; a Molecular Neuroscience Department , George Mason University , Fairfax , VA , USA.
  • Chernyak S; b Berlin School of Mind and Brain , Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin , Berlin , Germany.
  • Hoffman M; a Molecular Neuroscience Department , George Mason University , Fairfax , VA , USA.
  • Deshpande G; c Second Judicial District , Denver , CO , USA.
  • Dal Monte O; d John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation's Research Network on Law and Neuroscience , Nashville , TN , USA.
  • Knutson KM; e AU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering , Auburn University , Auburn , AL , USA.
  • Grafman J; f Department of Psychology , Auburn University , Auburn , AL , USA.
  • Krueger F; g Department of Psychology , Yale University , New Haven , CT , USA.
Soc Neurosci ; 12(2): 124-134, 2017 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26942651
ABSTRACT
Third-party punishment (TPP) for norm violations is an essential deterrent in large-scale human societies, and builds on two essential cognitive functions evaluating legal responsibility and determining appropriate punishment. Despite converging evidence that TPP is mediated by a specific set of brain regions, little is known about their effective connectivity (direction and strength of connections). Applying parametric event-related functional MRI in conjunction with multivariate Granger causality analysis, we asked healthy participants to estimate how much punishment a hypothetical perpetrator deserves for intentionally committing criminal offenses varying in levels of harm. Our results confirmed that TPP legal decisions are based on two domain-general networks the mentalizing network for evaluating legal responsibility and the central-executive network for determining appropriate punishment. Further, temporal pole (TP) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (PFC) emerged as hubs of the mentalizing network, uniquely generating converging output connections to ventromedial PFC, temporo-parietal junction, and posterior cingulate. In particular, dorsomedial PFC received inputs only from TP and both its activation and its connectivity to dorsolateral PFC correlated with degree of punishment. This supports the hypothesis that dorsomedial PFC acts as the driver of the TPP activation pattern, leading to the decision on the appropriate punishment. In conclusion, these results advance our understanding of the organizational elements of the TPP brain networks and provide better insights into the mental states of judges and jurors tasked with blaming and punishing legal wrongs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Punição / Controle Social Formal / Pensamento / Encéfalo / Tomada de Decisões Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Soc Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Punição / Controle Social Formal / Pensamento / Encéfalo / Tomada de Decisões Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Soc Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos