Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tumour-associated and non-tumour-associated microbiota in colorectal cancer.
Flemer, Burkhardt; Lynch, Denise B; Brown, Jillian M R; Jeffery, Ian B; Ryan, Feargal J; Claesson, Marcus J; O'Riordain, Micheal; Shanahan, Fergus; O'Toole, Paul W.
Afiliação
  • Flemer B; APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Lynch DB; School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Brown JM; APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Jeffery IB; School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Ryan FJ; APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Claesson MJ; School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • O'Riordain M; APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Shanahan F; School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • O'Toole PW; APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Gut ; 66(4): 633-643, 2017 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26992426
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

A signature that unifies the colorectal cancer (CRC) microbiota across multiple studies has not been identified. In addition to methodological variance, heterogeneity may be caused by both microbial and host response differences, which was addressed in this study.

DESIGN:

We prospectively studied the colonic microbiota and the expression of specific host response genes using faecal and mucosal samples ('ON' and 'OFF' the tumour, proximal and distal) from 59 patients undergoing surgery for CRC, 21 individuals with polyps and 56 healthy controls. Microbiota composition was determined by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing; expression of host genes involved in CRC progression and immune response was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR.

RESULTS:

The microbiota of patients with CRC differed from that of controls, but alterations were not restricted to the cancerous tissue. Differences between distal and proximal cancers were detected and faecal microbiota only partially reflected mucosal microbiota in CRC. Patients with CRC can be stratified based on higher level structures of mucosal-associated bacterial co-abundance groups (CAGs) that resemble the previously formulated concept of enterotypes. Of these, Bacteroidetes Cluster 1 and Firmicutes Cluster 1 were in decreased abundance in CRC mucosa, whereas Bacteroidetes Cluster 2, Firmicutes Cluster 2, Pathogen Cluster and Prevotella Cluster showed increased abundance in CRC mucosa. CRC-associated CAGs were differentially correlated with the expression of host immunoinflammatory response genes.

CONCLUSIONS:

CRC-associated microbiota profiles differ from those in healthy subjects and are linked with distinct mucosal gene-expression profiles. Compositional alterations in the microbiota are not restricted to cancerous tissue and differ between distal and proximal cancers.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / RNA Ribossômico 16S / Pólipos do Colo / Colo / Neoplasias do Colo / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gut Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / RNA Ribossômico 16S / Pólipos do Colo / Colo / Neoplasias do Colo / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gut Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda