Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term survival after surgical aortic valve replacement among patients over 65 years of age.
Sharabiani, Mansour T A; Fiorentino, Francesca; Angelini, Gianni D; Patel, Nishith N.
Afiliação
  • Sharabiani MT; Academic Cardiac Surgery , National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London , London , UK.
  • Fiorentino F; Academic Cardiac Surgery , National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London , London , UK.
  • Angelini GD; Academic Cardiac Surgery, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Patel NN; Academic Cardiac Surgery , National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London , London , UK.
Open Heart ; 3(1): e000338, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27042318
OBJECTIVE: Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains the gold standard therapy for severe aortic stenosis. Long-term survival data following AVR is required. Our objective was to provide a detailed contemporary benchmark of long-term survival following AVR among elderly patients (≥65 years) in the UK. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1815 adult patients undergoing surgical AVR± coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery at a single UK centre between 1996 and 2011. Our main outcome was patient survival, which was assessed by linkage to census records at the Office for National Statistics. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 75 (±5.6) years. Patients in the AVR alone group had a slightly higher median survival of 10.9 (95% CI 10.5 to 11.8) years than the AVR+CABG group which had a median survival of 9.6 (95% CI 8.7 to 10.1) years (p=0.001 of log-rank test (LRT) for equality of survivor functions). The presence of chronic kidney disease, severely impaired left ventricular function or being a current smoker were each associated with a ≥50% increased risk of long-term mortality. Comparison of our study cohort patients and the reference (operation year, age and gender matched) UK population suggested no difference in survival probability up to 8 years (p=0.55). However, for longer periods of follow-up, the difference became increasingly significant (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival following surgical AVR in patients over 65 years of age is excellent and up to 8 years is comparable to the matched general population.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Open Heart Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Open Heart Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article