Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barcoded sequencing reveals diverse intrauterine microbiomes in patients suffering with endometrial polyps.
Fang, Rui-Li; Chen, Lin-Xing; Shu, Wen-Sheng; Yao, Shu-Zhong; Wang, Si-Wen; Chen, Yu-Qing.
Afiliação
  • Fang RL; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Chen LX; State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, College of Ecology and Evolution, Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Shu WS; State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, College of Ecology and Evolution, Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Yao SZ; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Wang SW; Department of Vascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Chen YQ; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Am J Transl Res ; 8(3): 1581-92, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27186283
ABSTRACT
Results of this study showed that the bacterial composition in vagina (V) greatly differed from intrauterine microbiome (I). Microbiomes were present in all intrauterine samples of healthy women (Group H (I)) and patients with endometrial polyps (EP) (including Group EP (I) and Group EP/chronic endometritis (CE) (I)). Indeed, the intrauterine bacteria population in Group EP/CE (I) were more diverse than those in Groups EP (I) and H (I). The result also confirmed the bacterial composition differences between vagina and uterus as well as the intrauterine microbiome alteration in the patients, compared to the healthy. Although bacteria of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, dominated the intrauterine microbiome in all samples, however, proportions of Firmicutes from Group EP/CE (I) and Group EP (I) were much higher than that from Group H (I), in contrast, the proportions of Proteobacteria were far lower than the healthy. At the genus level, compared to Group H (I), it is found that proportions of Lactobacillus, Gardnerella, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, and Alteromonas were significantly higher, and that of Pseudomonas were significantly lower in Group EP/CE (I) or Group EP (I). In addition, lower proportions of Enterobacter and Sphingomonas and a higher proportion of Prevotella were also observed in Group EP/CE (I). In conclusion, uterine microbiomes between patients with EP and the healthy are significantly different and all the potentially important variation of uterine microbes may cause EP, but not definitively related to CE. Further experiments should be performed to test these relationships to endometritis occurrence.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transl Res Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transl Res Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China