Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Bicuspid Aortic Valve Imaging Classification for the TAVR Era.
Jilaihawi, Hasan; Chen, Mao; Webb, John; Himbert, Dominique; Ruiz, Carlos E; Rodés-Cabau, Josep; Pache, Gregor; Colombo, Antonio; Nickenig, Georg; Lee, Michael; Tamburino, Corrado; Sievert, Horst; Abramowitz, Yigal; Tarantini, Giuseppe; Alqoofi, Faisal; Chakravarty, Tarun; Kashif, Mohammad; Takahashi, Nobuyuki; Kazuno, Yoshio; Maeno, Yoshio; Kawamori, Hiroyuki; Chieffo, Alaide; Blanke, Philipp; Dvir, Danny; Ribeiro, Henrique Barbosa; Feng, Yuan; Zhao, Zhen-Gang; Sinning, Jan-Malte; Kliger, Chad; Giustino, Gennaro; Pajerski, Basia; Imme, Sebastiano; Grube, Eberhard; Leipsic, Jonathon; Vahanian, Alec; Michev, Iassen; Jelnin, Vladimir; Latib, Azeem; Cheng, Wen; Makkar, Raj.
Afiliação
  • Jilaihawi H; Department of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: hasanjilaihawi@gmail.com.
  • Chen M; Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Webb J; St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Himbert D; Department of Cardiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Ruiz CE; Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York, New York, New York.
  • Rodés-Cabau J; Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.
  • Pache G; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Colombo A; EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Nickenig G; Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology/Pneumology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Lee M; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
  • Tamburino C; Ferrarotto Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  • Sievert H; Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, CardioVasculäres Centrum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Abramowitz Y; Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
  • Tarantini G; University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Alqoofi F; University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Chakravarty T; Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
  • Kashif M; Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
  • Takahashi N; Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
  • Kazuno Y; Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
  • Maeno Y; Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
  • Kawamori H; Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
  • Chieffo A; EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Blanke P; St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada; University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Dvir D; St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Ribeiro HB; Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.
  • Feng Y; Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Zhao ZG; Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Sinning JM; Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology/Pneumology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Kliger C; Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York, New York, New York.
  • Giustino G; EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Pajerski B; St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Imme S; Ferrarotto Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  • Grube E; Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology/Pneumology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Leipsic J; St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Vahanian A; Department of Cardiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Michev I; EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Jelnin V; Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York, New York, New York.
  • Latib A; EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Cheng W; Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
  • Makkar R; Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 9(10): 1145-1158, 2016 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27372022
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to evaluate transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortic stenosis (AS), with a particular emphasis on TAVR-directed bicuspid aortic valve imaging (BAVi) of morphological classification.

BACKGROUND:

TAVR has been used to treat BAV-AS but with heterogeneous outcomes and uncertainty regarding the relevance of morphology.

METHODS:

In 14 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Asia, 130 BAV-AS patients underwent TAVR. Baseline cardiac computed tomography (CT) was analyzed by a dedicated Corelab. Outcomes were assessed in line with Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria.

RESULTS:

Bicommissural BAV (vs. tricommissural) accounted for 68.9% of those treated in North America, 88.9% in Europe, and 95.5% in Asia (p = 0.003). For bicommissural bicuspids, non-raphe type (vs. raphe type) BAV accounted for 11.9% of those treated in North America, 9.4% in Europe, and 61.9% in Asia (p < 0.001). Overall rates of 30-day mortality (3.8%) and cerebrovascular events (3.2%) were favorable and similar among anatomical subsets. The rate of new permanent pacemaker insertion was high (26.2%) and similar between balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expanding (SE) designs (BE 25.5% vs. SE 26.9%; p = 0.83); there was a trend to greater permanent pacemaker insertion in BE TAVR in the presence of coronary cusp fusion BAV morphology. Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) ≥ moderate was 18.1% overall but lower at 11.5% in those with pre-procedural CT. In the absence of pre-procedural CT, there was an excess of PAR in BE TAVR that was not the case in those with a pre-procedural CT; SE TAVR required more post-dilation. Predictors of PAR included intercommissural distance for bicommissural bicuspids (odd ratio [OR] 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.84; p = 0.036) and lack of a baseline CT for annular measurement (OR 3.03; 95% CI 1.20 to 7.69; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this multicenter study, TAVR achieved favorable outcomes in patients with pre-procedural CT, with the exception of high permanent pacemaker rates for all devices and shapes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter / Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Asia / Europa Idioma: En Revista: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter / Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Asia / Europa Idioma: En Revista: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article