Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-Term Follow-Up of Isolated Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead Implant Using a Minithoracotomy Approach for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
McALOON, Christopher J; Anderson, Benjamin M; Dimitri, Wadih; Panting, Jonathan; Yusuf, Shamil; Bhudia, Sunil K; Osman, Faizel.
Afiliação
  • McALOON CJ; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK.
  • Anderson BM; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK.
  • Dimitri W; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK.
  • Panting J; Department of Cardiology, Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Yusuf S; Department of Cardiology, Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Bhudia SK; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK.
  • Osman F; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK. faizel.osman@btinternet.com.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 39(10): 1052-1060, 2016 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27501471
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Transvenous left ventricular (LV) lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy is unsuccessful in 5-10% of reported cases. These patients may benefit from isolated surgical placement of an epicardial LV lead via minithoracotomy approach.

AIM:

To evaluate the success of this approach at long-term follow-up.

METHODS:

Retrospective evaluation of all consecutive patients undergoing isolated epicardial LV lead placement after failed transvenous attempt over a 6-year period. Data collected on baseline parameters, procedural details, and outcome at follow-up (hospital stay, complications, mortality, and clinical response).

RESULTS:

Forty-two patients underwent epicardial lead implant. Five died within 1 year (11.9%) two (4.8%) died within 30-days post op (one from intraoperative hemorrhage, the other from multiple organ failure); 39 (95.1%) were admitted to the high dependency unit and transferred to the ward <24 hours. Median hospital stay was 3.4 ± 1.9 days. The overall complication rate was 17.5% (n = 7) 15.0% (n = 6) short term and 2.5% (n = 1) long term; these included three (7.5%) LV noncapture events all treated with reprogramming. There were two (5.0%) wound infections requiring oral antibiotics and two (5.0%) device infections requiring intravenous antibiotics (one had device resiting, the other developed septic shock requiring intensive care admission). Assessment of clinical response was possible in 34 (81.0%) at follow-up 21 (61.8%) were responders and 13 (28.2%) nonresponders with no significant differences between these groups; no clinical predictors of response were identified.

CONCLUSION:

Isolated epicardial LV lead implant using minithoracotomy is relatively safe and effective at successful LV pacing. Response rate and postoperative recovery at long-term follow-up are reasonable in these high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Ventrículos do Coração Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Ventrículos do Coração Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido