Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is the role of retroperitoneal exploration in optimally debulked stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study.
Rungruang, Bunja J; Miller, Austin; Krivak, Thomas C; Horowitz, Neil S; Rodriguez, Noah; Hamilton, Chad A; Backes, Floor J; Carson, Linda F; Friedlander, Michael; Mutch, David G; Goodheart, Michael J; Tewari, Krishnansu S; Wenham, Robert M; Bookman, Michael A; Maxwell, G Larry; Richard, Scott D.
Afiliação
  • Rungruang BJ; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia of Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
  • Miller A; Gynecologic Oncology Group, Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
  • Krivak TC; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Pennsylvania Allegheny Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Horowitz NS; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Rodriguez N; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California.
  • Hamilton CA; Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Backes FJ; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Carson LF; Department of OB/GYN and Women's Health, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Friedlander M; Department of Cancer Medicine, ANZGOG, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Mutch DG; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
  • Goodheart MJ; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Tewari KS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Medical Center-Irvine, Orange, California.
  • Wenham RM; Department of Gynecology Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
  • Bookman MA; Medical Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Tuscon, Arizona.
  • Maxwell GL; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital Women's Center, Falls Church, Virginia.
  • Richard SD; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cancer ; 123(6): 985-993, 2017 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27864921
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of retroperitoneal (RP) exploration on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with stage IIIC disease who underwent optimal debulking surgery.

METHODS:

Data were collected from records of the Gynecologic Oncology Group 182 (GOG-182) study of stage IIIC EOC patients cytoreduced to no gross residual disease (R0) or minimal gross residual (<1 cm) disease (MGRD) at primary surgery. Patients with stage IIIC disease by intraperitoneal (IP) tumor were included and divided into 3 groups 1) > 2 cm IP tumor without lymph node involvement (IP/RP-), 2) > 2 cm IP tumor with lymph node involvement (IP/RP+), and 3) > 2 cm IP tumor with no RP exploration (IP/RP?). The effects of disease distribution and RP exploration on PFS and OS were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards methods.

RESULTS:

There were 1871 stage IIIC patients in GOG-182 who underwent optimal primary debulking surgery. Of these, 689 (36.8%) underwent RP exploration with removal of lymph nodes from at least 1 para-aortic site, and 1182 (63.2%) did not. There were 269 patients in the IP/RP- group, 420 patients in the IP/RP + group, and 1182 patients in the IP/RP? group. Improved PFS (18.5 vs 16.0 months; P < .0001) and OS (53.3 vs 42.8 months; P < .0001) were associated with RP exploration versus no exploration. Patients with MGRD had improved PFS (16.8 vs 15.1 months, P = 0.0108) and OS (44.9 vs 40.5 months, P = 0.0076) versus no exploration.

CONCLUSIONS:

RP exploration at the time of primary surgery in patients with optimally debulked stage IIIC EOC is associated with a survival benefit. Cancer 2017;123985-93. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Geórgia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Geórgia