Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.
Dejaegher, Joost; Walraevens, Joris; van Loon, Johannes; Van Calenbergh, Frank; Demaerel, Philippe; Goffin, Jan.
Afiliação
  • Dejaegher J; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Joost.dejaegher@uzleuven.be.
  • Walraevens J; Division of Biomechanics, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
  • van Loon J; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Van Calenbergh F; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Demaerel P; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Goffin J; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eur Spine J ; 26(4): 1191-1198, 2017 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27904963
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Cervical arthroplasty is being used as an alternative for cervical fusion, but long-term follow-up results have rarely been reported. In this paper, we present 10-year follow-up results after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis in a single center.

METHODS:

89 patients underwent implantation of a single-level Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis to treat radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Clinical (Neurological Success, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck- and Arm-Pain, and SF-36) and radiological follow-up was prospectively organized up to 10 years after surgery. Adverse events and second surgeries were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS:

Ten-year follow-up data were available for 72 (81%) patients. Maintenance or improvement of the neurological state was seen in 89% of patients after 10-year follow-up. SF-36 PCS scores improved significantly at all follow-up points. SF-36 MCS improvement was significant at 4 and 6 year, but not at 8- and 10-year follow-up. Significant improvement for NDI, and Neck- and Arm-Pain scores was found for the subgroup of patients in whom these data were available. Mean angular motion of the prosthesis at 10-year follow-up was 8.6°. Mobility of the device, defined as >2° of angular motion, was reached in 81% of patients. During the study period, 21 patients (24%) developed new or recurrent radiculopathy or myelopathy, the majority of these being treated conservatively. Seven patients (8%) required 8 additional spine surgeries to treat persistent or recurrent symptoms. Of these, 2 patients (2%) were reoperated at the index level and at 5 (6%) an adjacent level.

CONCLUSION:

In this study, favorable long-term clinical outcome after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis was seen, with the majority of prostheses remaining mobile after 10-year follow-up. However, still 6% of patients required adjacent level surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vértebras Cervicais / Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Implantação de Prótese / Disco Intervertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vértebras Cervicais / Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Implantação de Prótese / Disco Intervertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica