Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of a clinical diagnostic matrix for characterizing inherited epidermolysis bullosa.
Yenamandra, V K; Moss, C; Sreenivas, V; Khan, M; Sivasubbu, S; Sharma, V K; Sethuraman, G.
Afiliação
  • Yenamandra VK; Department of Dermatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Moss C; Department of Dermatology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, U.K.
  • Sreenivas V; Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Khan M; Sadd Maareb Medical Centre, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E.
  • Sivasubbu S; CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
  • Sharma VK; Department of Dermatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Sethuraman G; Department of Dermatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Br J Dermatol ; 176(6): 1624-1632, 2017 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27925151
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Accurately diagnosing the subtype of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is critical for management and genetic counselling. Modern laboratory techniques are largely inaccessible in developing countries, where the diagnosis remains clinical and often inaccurate.

OBJECTIVES:

To develop a simple clinical diagnostic tool to aid in the diagnosis and subtyping of EB.

METHODS:

We developed a matrix indicating presence or absence of a set of distinctive clinical features (as rows) for the nine most prevalent EB subtypes (as columns). To test an individual patient, presence or absence of these features was compared with the findings expected in each of the nine subtypes to see which corresponded best. If two or more diagnoses scored equally, the diagnosis with the greatest number of specific features was selected. The matrix was tested using findings from 74 genetically characterized patients with EB aged > 6 months by an investigator blinded to molecular diagnosis. For concordance, matrix diagnoses were compared with molecular diagnoses.

RESULTS:

Overall, concordance between the matrix and molecular diagnoses for the four major types of EB was 91·9%, with a kappa coefficient of 0·88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·81-0·95; P < 0·001]. The matrix achieved a 75·7% agreement in classifying EB into its nine subtypes, with a kappa coefficient of 0·73 (95% CI 0·69-0·77; P < 0·001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The matrix appears to be simple, valid and useful in predicting the type and subtype of EB. An electronic version will facilitate further testing.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epidermólise Bolhosa Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epidermólise Bolhosa Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia