Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Carbon Dioxide Exposure Resulting From Hood Protective Equipment Used in Joint Arthroplasty Surgery.
Patel, Suhani; Fine, Janelle M; Lim, Michael J; Copp, Steven N; Rosen, Adam S; West, John B; Prisk, G Kim.
Afiliação
  • Patel S; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California.
  • Fine JM; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California.
  • Lim MJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California.
  • Copp SN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California.
  • Rosen AS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California.
  • West JB; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California.
  • Prisk GK; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California.
J Arthroplasty ; 32(8): 2386-2389, 2017 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28499626
BACKGROUND: To protect both the surgeon and patient during procedures, hooded protection shields are used during joint arthroplasty procedures. Headache, malaise, and dizziness, consistent with increased carbon dioxide (CO2) exposure, have been anecdotally reported by surgeons using hoods. We hypothesized that increased CO2 concentrations were causing reported symptoms. METHODS: Six healthy subjects (4 men) donned hooded protection, fan at the highest setting. Arm cycle ergometry at workloads of 12 and 25 watts (W) simulated workloads encountered during arthroplasty. Inspired O2 and CO2 concentrations at the nares were continuously measured at rest, 12 W, and 25 W. At each activity level, the fan was deactivated and the times for CO2 to reach 0.5% and 1.0% were measured. RESULTS: At rest, inspired CO2 was 0.14% ± 0.04%. Exercise had significant effect on CO2 compared with rest (0.26% ± 0.08% at 12 W, P = .04; 0.31% ± 0.05% at 25 W, P = .003). Inspired CO2 concentration increased rapidly with fan deactivation, with the time for CO2 to increase to 0.5% and 1.0% after fan deactivation being rapid but variable (0.5%, 12 ± 9 seconds; 1%, 26 ± 15 seconds). Time for CO2 to return below 0.5% after fan reactivation was 20 ± 37 seconds. CONCLUSION: During simulated joint arthroplasty, CO2 remained within Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards with the fan at the highest setting. With fan deactivation, CO2 concentration rapidly exceeds OSHA standards.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia / Equipamentos de Proteção / Respiração / Dióxido de Carbono Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia / Equipamentos de Proteção / Respiração / Dióxido de Carbono Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article