Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inequalities in uptake of prenatal screening according to ethnicity and socio-economic status in the four largest cities of the Netherlands (2011-2013).
Posthumus, Anke G; Peters, Ingrid A; Borsboom, Gerard J; Knapen, Maarten F C M; Bonsel, Gouke J.
Afiliação
  • Posthumus AG; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Peters IA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Borsboom GJ; Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Knapen MFCM; Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bonsel GJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Prenat Diagn ; 37(10): 959-967, 2017 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28621806
OBJECTIVES: In the Netherlands, all women are claimed to have equal access to prenatal screening (PS). Prior research demonstrated substantial inequalities in PS uptake associated with socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic background. The suggested pathway was a lack of intention to participate in PS among these subgroups. We studied the background of inequalities in PS participation, challenging intention heterogeneity as the single explanation. METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression analyses of the national PS registry, focusing on the four largest cities in the Netherlands (n = 4578, years 2011-2013), stratified by SES. OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) any uptake of PS (yes/no) and (2) uptake (one/two tests) for women who intended to participate in two tests. Determinants included intention, ethnicity, practice, and age. RESULTS: Of non-Western women, 85.7% were screened versus 89.7% of Western women. Intention was an important explanatory factor in all models. However, after correction for intention, ethnicity remained a significant determinant for differences in uptake. Ethnicity and SES also interacted, indicating that non-Western women in low SES areas had the lowest uptake (corrected for intention). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Socioeconomic status and ethnicity related inequalities in PS uptake are only partially explained by intention heterogeneity; other pathways, in particular provider-related determinants, may play a role. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diagnóstico Pré-Natal / Classe Social / Etnicidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Prenat Diagn Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diagnóstico Pré-Natal / Classe Social / Etnicidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Prenat Diagn Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda