Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evidence-based anatomical review areas derived from systematic analysis of cases from a radiological departmental discrepancy meeting.
Chin, S C; Weir-McCall, J R; Yeap, P M; White, R D; Budak, M J; Duncan, G; Oliver, T B; Zealley, I A.
Afiliação
  • Chin SC; Department of Clinical Radiology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee, Tayside, Scotland, DD1 9SY, UK. Electronic address: s.chin1@nhs.net.
  • Weir-McCall JR; Department of Clinical Radiology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee, Tayside, Scotland, DD1 9SY, UK.
  • Yeap PM; Department of Clinical Radiology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee, Tayside, Scotland, DD1 9SY, UK.
  • White RD; Department of Clinical Radiology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee, Tayside, Scotland, DD1 9SY, UK; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK.
  • Budak MJ; Gold Coast Radiology, Queensland, Australia.
  • Duncan G; Department of Clinical Radiology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee, Tayside, Scotland, DD1 9SY, UK.
  • Oliver TB; Department of Clinical Radiology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee, Tayside, Scotland, DD1 9SY, UK.
  • Zealley IA; Department of Clinical Radiology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Ninewells Avenue, Dundee, Tayside, Scotland, DD1 9SY, UK.
Clin Radiol ; 72(10): 902.e1-902.e12, 2017 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28687168
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To produce short checklists of specific anatomical review sites for different regions of the body based on the frequency of radiological errors reviewed at radiology discrepancy meetings, thereby creating "evidence-based" review areas for radiology reporting. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A single centre discrepancy database was retrospectively reviewed from a 5-year period. All errors were classified by type, modality, body system, and specific anatomical location. Errors were assigned to one of four body regions chest, abdominopelvic, central nervous system (CNS), and musculoskeletal (MSK). Frequencies of errors in anatomical locations were then analysed.

RESULTS:

There were 561 errors in 477 examinations; 290 (46%) errors occurred in the abdomen/pelvis, 99 (15.7%) in the chest, 117 (18.5%) in the CNS, and 125 (19.9%) in the MSK system. In each body system, the five most common location were chest lung bases on computed tomography (CT), apices on radiography, pulmonary vasculature, bones, and mediastinum; abdominopelvic vasculature, colon, kidneys, liver, and pancreas; CNS intracranial vasculature, peripheral cerebral grey matter, bone, parafalcine, and the frontotemporal lobes surrounding the Sylvian fissure; and MSK calvarium, sacrum, pelvis, chest, and spine.

CONCLUSION:

The five listed locations accounted for >50% of all perceptual errors suggesting an avenue for focused review at the end of reporting.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia / Diagnóstico por Imagem / Medicina Baseada em Evidências / Erros de Diagnóstico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Radiol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia / Diagnóstico por Imagem / Medicina Baseada em Evidências / Erros de Diagnóstico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Radiol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article