Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy was slightly more effective than placebo for pain, but not for disability, in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised placebo controlled trial with short and longer term follow-up.
Garcia, Alessandra Narciso; Costa, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes; Hancock, Mark J; Souza, Fabrício Soares de; Gomes, Geórgia Vieira Freschi de Oliveira; Almeida, Matheus Oliveira de; Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena.
Afiliação
  • Garcia AN; Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Costa LDCM; Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Hancock MJ; Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Souza FS; Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Gomes GVFO; Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Almeida MO; Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Costa LOP; Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Br J Sports Med ; 52(9): 594-600, 2018 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28701365
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) is one of the exercise approaches recommended by low back pain (LBP) guidelines. We investigated the efficacy of MDT compared with placebo in patients with chronic LBP.

METHODS:

This was a prospectively registered, two-arm randomised placebo controlled trial, with a blinded assessor. A total of 148 patients seeking care for chronic LBP were randomly allocated to either MDT (n=74) or placebo (n=74). Patients from both groups received 10 treatment sessions over 5 weeks. Patients from both groups also received an educational booklet. Clinical outcomes were obtained at the end of treatment (5 weeks) and 3, 6 and 12 months after randomisation. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability at the end of treatment (5 weeks). We also conducted a subgroup analysis to identify potential treatment effect modifiers that could predict a better response to MDT treatment.

RESULTS:

The MDT group had greater improvements in pain intensity at the end of treatment (mean difference (MD) -1.00, 95% CI -2.09 to -0.01) but not for disability (MD -0.84, 95% CI -2.62 to 0.93). We did not detect between-group differences for any secondary outcomes, nor were any treatment effect modifiers identified. Patients did not report any adverse events.

CONCLUSION:

We found a small and likely not clinically relevant difference in pain intensity favouring the MDT method immediately at the end of 5 weeks of treatment but not for disability. No other difference was found for any of the primary or secondary outcomes at any follow-up times. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02123394).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Dor Lombar / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Dor Lombar / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil