Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk stratification in patients with heart failure: the value of considering both global longitudinal left ventricular strain and mechanical dispersion.
Mornos, Cristian; Muntean, Danina; Mornos, Aniko; Crisan, Simina; Petrescu, Lucian; Ionac, Adina; Sosdean, Raluca; Cozma, Dragos.
Afiliação
  • Mornos C; a Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cardiology Clinic, Timisoara, Romania.
  • Muntean D; b Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Timisoara, Romania.
  • Mornos A; a Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cardiology Clinic, Timisoara, Romania.
  • Crisan S; b Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Timisoara, Romania.
  • Petrescu L; a Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cardiology Clinic, Timisoara, Romania.
  • Ionac A; a Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cardiology Clinic, Timisoara, Romania.
  • Sosdean R; b Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Timisoara, Romania.
  • Cozma D; a Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cardiology Clinic, Timisoara, Romania.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol ; 95(11): 1360-1368, 2017 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28738164
In previous studies, mechanical dispersion (MD) predicted ventricular arrhythmias independently of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Moreover, the combination of MD and global longitudinal strain (GLS) increased the prediction of arrhythmic events. We investigated the prognostic value of a new 2-dimensional strain index, GLS/MD, in patients with heart failure (HF). We analyzed 340 consecutive HF outpatients in sinus rhythm. Echocardiography was performed at 1.6 ± 0.4 months after hospital discharge. The end point included sudden cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation, and sustained ventricular tachycardia (SCD/VA). During the follow-up period (36 ± 9 months), SCD/VA occurred in 48 patients (14.1%). A multivariate Cox regression analysis, which included LVEF, early diastolic transmitral / mitral annular velocity ratio (E/E'), GLS, MD, and GLS/MD in the model, revealed that GLS/MD was the best independent predictor of SCD/VA (HR = 3.22, 95% confidence interval = 1.72-6.15, p = 0.03). Separate inclusion of LVEF, systolic mitral annular velocity, E/E', GLS, and MD together with GLS/MD showed that GLS/MD remained the best predictor of SCD/VA (each p < 0.05). The optimal GLS/MD cutoff value to predict SCA/VA was -0.20%/ms (80% sensitivity, 76% specificity). Irrespective of LVEF, free survival was significantly better in patients with GLS/MD ≤ -0.2%/ms (log-rank test, p < 0.001). In conclusion, GLS/MD may improve cardiovascular risk stratification in subjects with HF.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estresse Mecânico / Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Can J Physiol Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Romênia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estresse Mecânico / Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Can J Physiol Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Romênia