Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in forearm strength, endurance, and hemodynamic kinetics between male boulderers and lead rock climbers.
Fryer, S; Stone, K J; Sveen, J; Dickson, T; España-Romero, V; Giles, D; Balás, J; Stoner, L; Draper, N.
Afiliação
  • Fryer S; a School of Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Applied Sciences , University of Gloucestershire , Gloucester , UK.
  • Stone KJ; a School of Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Applied Sciences , University of Gloucestershire , Gloucester , UK.
  • Sveen J; b School of Life, Sport and Social Sciences , Edinburgh Napier University , Edinburgh , UK.
  • Dickson T; a School of Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Applied Sciences , University of Gloucestershire , Gloucester , UK.
  • España-Romero V; c Department of Physical Education , School of Education , University of Cadiz, Cadiz , Spain.
  • Giles D; d Department of Life Sciences, College of Life and Natural Sciences , University of Derby , Buxton , UK.
  • Balás J; e Faculty of Physical Education and Sport , Charles University , Prague , Czech Republic.
  • Stoner L; f Department of Sport and Exercise , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
  • Draper N; g School of Health Sciences, College of Education, Health and Human Development , University of Canterbury , Christchurch , New Zealand.
Eur J Sport Sci ; 17(9): 1177-1183, 2017 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28753391
ABSTRACT
This study examined differences in the oxygenation kinetics and strength and endurance characteristics of boulderers and lead sport climbers. Using near infrared spectroscopy, 13-boulderers, 10-lead climbers, and 10-controls completed assessments of oxidative capacity index and muscle oxygen consumption (m⩒O2) in the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Additionally, forearm strength (maximal volitional contraction MVC), endurance (force-time integral FTI at 40% MVC), and forearm volume (FAV and ΔFAV) was assessed. MVC was significantly greater in boulderers compared to lead climbers (mean difference = 9.6, 95% CI 5.2-14 kg). FDP and EDC oxidative capacity indexes were significantly greater (p = .041 and .013, respectively) in lead climbers and boulderers compared to controls (mean difference = -1.166, 95% CI (-3.264 to 0.931 s) and mean difference = -1.120, 95% CI (-3.316 to 1.075 s), respectively) with no differences between climbing disciplines. Climbers had a significantly greater FTI compared to controls (mean difference = 2205, 95% CI= 1114-3296 and mean difference = 1716, 95% CI = 553-2880, respectively) but not between disciplines. There were no significant group differences in ΔFAV or m⩒O2. The greater MVC in boulderers may be due to neural adaptation and not hypertrophy. A greater oxidative capacity index in both climbing groups suggests that irrespective of climbing discipline, trainers, coaches, and practitioners should consider forearm specific aerobic training to aid performance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Consumo de Oxigênio / Resistência Física / Músculo Esquelético / Força Muscular / Antebraço / Hemodinâmica / Montanhismo Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Sport Sci Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Consumo de Oxigênio / Resistência Física / Músculo Esquelético / Força Muscular / Antebraço / Hemodinâmica / Montanhismo Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Sport Sci Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido