Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Duplex ultrasonography for the detection of vertebral artery stenosis: A comparison with CT angiography.
Rozeman, Anouk D; Hund, Hajo; Westein, Michel; Wermer, Marieke J H; Lycklama À Nijeholt, Geert J; Boiten, Jelis; Schimsheimer, Robert-Jan; Algra, Ale.
Afiliação
  • Rozeman AD; Department of Neurology MC Haaglanden The Hague The Netherlands.
  • Hund H; Department of Radiology MC Haaglanden The Hague The Netherlands.
  • Westein M; Department of Radiology MC Haaglanden The Hague The Netherlands.
  • Wermer MJH; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology MC Haaglanden The Hague The Netherlands.
  • Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ; Department of Neurology LUMC Leiden The Netherlands.
  • Boiten J; Department of Radiology MC Haaglanden The Hague The Netherlands.
  • Schimsheimer RJ; Department of Neurology MC Haaglanden The Hague The Netherlands.
  • Algra A; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology MC Haaglanden The Hague The Netherlands.
Brain Behav ; 7(8): e00750, 2017 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28828211
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Vertebrobasilar stenosis is frequent in patients with posterior circulation stroke and it increases risk of recurrence. We investigated feasibility of duplex ultrasonography (DUS) for screening for extracranial vertebral artery stenosis and compared it with CT angiography (CTA). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We gathered data on 337 consecutive patients who had DUS because of posterior circulation stroke or TIA. Matching CTA studies were retrieved and used as reference. Stenosis on CTA was considered "significant" if >50%, at DUS if Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) > 140 cm/s for the V1 segment and PSV > 125 cm/s for the V2 segment. We determined the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). In addition, we calculated which PSV cut-off value resulted in highest sensitivity with acceptable specificity.

RESULTS:

DUS was able to make an adequate measurement in 378 of 674 V1 segments and 673 of 674 V2 segments. DUS detected a significant stenosis in 52 of 378 V1 segments; 12 were confirmed by CTA (AUROC 0.73, 95% Confidence Interval 0.63-0.83). The optimal DUS PSV cut-off value for this segment was 90 cm/s. For the V2 segment there were too few stenoses to allow reliable assessment of diagnostic characteristics of DUS.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although DUS has a fair AUROC for detecting significant stenosis, adequate assessment of the V1 segment is often not possible due to anatomic difficulties. Assessment of the V2 segment is feasible but yielded few stenoses. Hence, we consider usefulness of DUS for screening of extracranial vertebral artery stenosis limited.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artéria Vertebral / Insuficiência Vertebrobasilar / Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Brain Behav Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artéria Vertebral / Insuficiência Vertebrobasilar / Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Brain Behav Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article