Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preimplantation genetic screening: results of a worldwide web-based survey.
Weissman, Ariel; Shoham, Gon; Shoham, Zeev; Fishel, Simon; Leong, Milton; Yaron, Yuval.
Afiliação
  • Weissman A; IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, 62 Halochamim Street, Holon, 5822012, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel. Electronic address: a_w@zahav.net.il.
  • Shoham G; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
  • Shoham Z; IVF Unit, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot, 7661041, Israel; Hadassah Medical School, Affiliated to the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Fishel S; CARE Fertility Group, John Webster House, 6 Lawrence Drive, Nottingham Business Park, Nottingham, NG14 5GU, UK.
  • Leong M; The IVF Clinic, 13/F Central Tower, 28 Queens Road Central, Hong Kong, China.
  • Yaron Y; IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, 62 Halochamim Street, Holon, 5822012, Israel; Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetic Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, 6423906, Israel.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 35(6): 693-700, 2017 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28988928
ABSTRACT
Our objective was to evaluate and characterize the extent and patterns of worldwide usage of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) among the assisted reproductive technique community. A prospective, web-based questionnaire with questions relating to practices of, and views on, PGS was directed to users and non-users of PGS. A total of 386 IVF units from 70 countries conducting 342,600 IVF cycles annually responded to the survey. A total of 77% of respondents routinely carry out PGS in their clinics for a variety of indications advanced maternal age (27%), recurrent implantation failure (32%) and recurrent pregnancy loss (31%). Few (6%) offer PGS to all their patients. In most cycles (72%), trophectoderm biopsy is carried out and either array-comparative genomic hybridization (59%) or next-generation sequencing (16%) are used for genetic analysis. Only 30% of respondents regard PGS as clearly evidenced-based, and most (84%) believe that more randomized controlled trials are needed to support the use of PGS. Despite ongoing debate and lack of robust evidence, most respondents support the use of PGS, and believe that it may aid in transferring only euploid embryos, thereby reducing miscarriage rates and multiple pregnancies, increasing live birth rates and reducing the risk of aneuploid pregnancies and births.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Biomed Online Assunto da revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Biomed Online Assunto da revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article