Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: Evaluation of practices and limits of use in rural areas in France.
Triffault-Fillit, C; Ferry, T; Perpoint, T; Adélaïde, L; Le Ngoc Tho, S; Ader, F; Chidiac, C; Valour, F.
Afiliação
  • Triffault-Fillit C; Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CRIOAc Lyon, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Département de médecine générale, université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Ferry T; Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CRIOAc Lyon, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Inserm U1111, centre international de recherche en infectiologie (CIRI), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Perpoint T; Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CRIOAc Lyon, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Adélaïde L; Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CRIOAc Lyon, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Le Ngoc Tho S; Département de médecine générale, université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Ader F; Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CRIOAc Lyon, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Inserm U1111, centre international de recherche en infectiologie (CIRI), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Chidiac C; Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CRIOAc Lyon, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Inserm U1111, centre international de recherche en infectiologie (CIRI), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Valour F; Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CRIOAc Lyon, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Inserm U1111, centre international de recherche en infectiologie (CIRI), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France. Electronic address: florent.valour@chu-lyon.fr.
Med Mal Infect ; 48(2): 130-135, 2018 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29050864
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) practices in a French rural area. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Descriptive study assessing knowledge, practices, and limitations of OPAT use among hospital practitioners (HP), family physicians (FP), and private nurses (PN).

RESULTS:

OPAT (mainly ceftriaxone and penicillins) was used by 69.6%, 73.3%, and 97.7% of the 23 HPs, 45 FPs, and 46 PNs mostly for respiratory or urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and/or multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. Overall, 65.2% of HPs and 37.8% of FPs were in contact with an infectious disease specialist. Knowledge of OPAT benefits and risks was lower for FPs than HPs. The main obstacles were the patient's geographic isolation (HPs), the availability of a venous catheter, the lack of training (FPs), and the expected OPAT-associated overwork (PNs).

CONCLUSION:

OPAT practice is weak in rural areas. Declared obstacles constitute fields of improvement for its essential expansion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Bacterianas / Assistência Ambulatorial / Antibacterianos Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Med Mal Infect Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Bacterianas / Assistência Ambulatorial / Antibacterianos Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Med Mal Infect Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França