Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early discharge and post-discharge outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
Xia, Leilei; Taylor, Benjamin L; Newton, Andrew D; Malhotra, Aseem; Pulido, Jose E; Strother, Marshall C; Guzzo, Thomas J.
Afiliação
  • Xia L; Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Taylor BL; Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Newton AD; Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Malhotra A; Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Pulido JE; Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Strother MC; Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Guzzo TJ; Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
BJU Int ; 121(4): 583-591, 2018 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29063682
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess whether discharging patients early after radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with an increased risk of readmission and post-discharge complications. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patients who underwent an elective RC from 2012 to 2015. Patients were stratified into two groups those with a length of hospital stay (LOS) of 4-5 days (early-discharge group) and those with an LOS of 6-9 days (routine-discharge group). We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess the impact of early discharge on 30-day readmission and post-discharge complication rates. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to validate the robustness of our primary analyses.

RESULTS:

A total of 3 311 patients were included. Unadjusted outcomes comparison showed no difference in readmission rate (21.6% vs 23.0%) or post-discharge complication rate (17.7% vs 19.6%) between the early-discharge and the routine-discharge group. Multivariable logistic regression also showed that early discharge was not associated with increased odds of readmission (odds ratio [OR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-1.22; P = 1.000) or post-discharge complications (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.77-1.17; P = 0.616). Two-step sensitivity analyses (excluding patients with LOS of 8-9 days, followed by patients with any pre-discharge adverse event) validated the robustness of our primary analyses. Subgroup analyses also yielded similar results in all subgroups except for the subgroup of patients aged ≥85 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

Early discharge after RC was not associated with increased readmissions or post-discharge complications. Future prospective studies, with defined peri-operative care pathways, are needed to identify potential components that may enable hospitals to discharge patients early without compromising post-discharge outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Cistectomia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alta do Paciente / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Cistectomia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos