Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Obstetrical provider knowledge and attitudes towards cell-free DNA screening: results of a cross-sectional national survey.
Chan, Wilson V; Johnson, Jo-Ann; Wilson, R Douglas; Metcalfe, Amy.
Afiliação
  • Chan WV; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, 4th Floor North Tower - Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada. wilson.chan2@ahs.ca.
  • Johnson JA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, 4th Floor North Tower - Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
  • Wilson RD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, 4th Floor North Tower - Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
  • Metcalfe A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, 4th Floor North Tower - Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 40, 2018 01 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29361931
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening has recently acquired tremendous attention, promising patients and healthcare providers a more accurate prenatal screen for aneuploidy than other current screening modalities. It is unclear how much knowledge regarding cfDNA screening obstetrical providers possess which has important implications for the quality and content of the informed consent patients receive.

METHODS:

A survey was designed to assess obstetrical provider knowledge and attitudes towards cfDNA screening and distributed online through the Society of Obstetricians & Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC). Chi-squared tests were used to detect differences in knowledge and attitudes between groups.

RESULTS:

207 respondents completed the survey, composed of 60.6% Obstetricians/Gynecologists (OB/GYN), 15.4% Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) specialists, 16.5% General Practitioners (GP), and 7.5% Midwives (MW). MFM demonstrated a significant trend of being most knowledgeable about cfDNA screening followed by OB/GYN, GP, and lastly MW in almost all aspects of cfDNA screening. All groups demonstrated an overall positive attitude towards cfDNA screening; however, OB/GYN and MFM demonstrated a significantly more positive attitude than GP and MW. Despite not yet being a diagnostic test, 19.4% of GP would offer termination of pregnancy immediately following a positive cfDNA screen result compared to none of the MFM and only few OB/GYN or MW.

CONCLUSIONS:

We have demonstrated that different types of obstetrical providers possess varying amounts of knowledge regarding cfDNA screening with MFM currently having greater knowledge to all other groups. All obstetrical providers must have adequate prenatal screening understanding so that we can embrace the benefits of this novel and promising technology while protecting the integrity of the informed consent process.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Pessoal de Saúde / Testes para Triagem do Soro Materno / Ácidos Nucleicos Livres / Obstetrícia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Pessoal de Saúde / Testes para Triagem do Soro Materno / Ácidos Nucleicos Livres / Obstetrícia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá