Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eye Movement Control in the Argus II Retinal-Prosthesis Enables Reduced Head Movement and Better Localization Precision.
Caspi, Avi; Roy, Arup; Wuyyuru, Varalakshmi; Rosendall, Paul E; Harper, Jason W; Katyal, Kapil D; Barry, Michael P; Dagnelie, Gislin; Greenberg, Robert J.
Afiliação
  • Caspi A; Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Roy A; Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., Sylmar, California, United States.
  • Wuyyuru V; Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., Sylmar, California, United States.
  • Rosendall PE; Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., Sylmar, California, United States.
  • Harper JW; The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, United States.
  • Katyal KD; The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, United States.
  • Barry MP; The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, United States.
  • Dagnelie G; Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
  • Greenberg RJ; Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 59(2): 792-802, 2018 02 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29392324
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Visual scanning by sighted individuals is done using eye and head movements. In contrast, scanning using the Argus II is solely done by head movement, since eye movements can introduce localization errors. Here, we tested if a scanning mode utilizing eye movements increases visual stability and reduces head movements in Argus II users.

Methods:

Eye positions were measured in real-time and were used to shift the region of interest (ROI) that is sent to the implant within the wide field of view (FOV) of the scene camera. Participants were able to use combined eye-head scanning shifting the camera by moving their head and shifting the ROI within the FOV by eye movement. Eight blind individuals implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis participated in the study. A white target appeared on a touchscreen monitor and the participants were instructed to report the location of the target by touching the monitor. We compared the spread of the responses, the time to complete the task, and the amount of head movements between combined eye-head and head-only scanning.

Results:

All participants benefited from the combined eye-head scanning mode. Better precision (i.e., narrower spread of the perceived location) was observed in six out of eight participants. Seven of eight participants were able to adopt a scanning strategy that enabled them to perform the task with significantly less head movement.

Conclusions:

Integrating an eye tracker into the Argus II is feasible, reduces head movements in a seated localization task, and improves pointing precision.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acuidade Visual / Cegueira / Movimentos da Cabeça / Movimentos Oculares / Próteses Visuais Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acuidade Visual / Cegueira / Movimentos da Cabeça / Movimentos Oculares / Próteses Visuais Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel