Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recontacting Patients with Updated Genetic Testing Recommendations for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma and Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma.
Romero Arenas, Minerva A; Rich, Thereasa A; Hyde, Samuel M; Busaidy, Naifa L; Cote, Gilbert J; Hu, Mimi I; Gagel, Robert F; Gidley, Paul W; Jimenez, Camilo; Kupferman, Michael E; Peterson, Susan K; Sherman, Steven I; Ying, Anita; Bassett, Roland L; Waguespack, Steven G; Perrier, Nancy D; Grubbs, Elizabeth G.
Afiliação
  • Romero Arenas MA; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Rich TA; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Hyde SM; Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Busaidy NL; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Cote GJ; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Hu MI; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gagel RF; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gidley PW; Department of Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Jimenez C; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Kupferman ME; Department of Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Peterson SK; Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Sherman SI; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Ying A; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Bassett RL; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Waguespack SG; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia & Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Perrier ND; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Grubbs EG; Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. eggrubbs@mdanderson.org.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(5): 1395-1402, 2018 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29427212
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

No guidelines exist regarding physicians' duty to inform former patients about novel genetic tests that may be medically beneficial. Research on the feasibility and efficacy of disseminating information and patient opinions on this topic is limited.

METHODS:

Adult patients treated at our institution from 1950 to 2010 for medullary thyroid cancer, pheochromocytoma, or paraganglioma were included if their history suggested being at-risk for a hereditary syndrome but genetic risk assessment would be incomplete by current standards. A questionnaire assessing behaviors and attitudes was mailed 6 weeks after an information letter describing new genetic tests, benefits, and risks was mailed.

RESULTS:

Ninety-seven of 312 (31.1%) eligible patients with an identified mailing address returned the questionnaire. After receiving the letter, 29.2% patients discussed genetic testing with their doctor, 39.3% considered pursuing genetic testing, and 8.5% underwent testing. Nearly all respondents (97%) indicated that physicians should inform patients about new developments that may improve their or their family's health, and 71% thought patients shared this responsibility. Most patients understood the letter (84%) and were pleased it was sent (84%), although 11% found it upsetting.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients believe it is important for physicians to inform them of potentially beneficial developments in genetic testing. However, physician-initiated letters to introduce new information appear inadequate alone in motivating patients to seek additional genetic counseling and testing. Further research is needed regarding optimal methods to notify former patients about new genetic tests and corresponding clinical and ethical implications.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Paraganglioma / Feocromocitoma / Papel do Médico / Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide / Testes Genéticos / Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais / Carcinoma Neuroendócrino / Comunicação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Paraganglioma / Feocromocitoma / Papel do Médico / Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide / Testes Genéticos / Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais / Carcinoma Neuroendócrino / Comunicação Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos