Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fertility Preservation Toolkit: A Clinician Resource to Assist Clinical Discussion and Decision Making in Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology.
Kemertzis, Matthew A; Ranjithakumaran, Harene; Hand, Meredith; Peate, Michelle; Gillam, Lynn; McCarthy, Maria; Super, Leanne; McQuillan, Sarah; Drew, Sarah; Jayasinghe, Yasmin; Orme, Lisa.
Afiliação
  • Kemertzis MA; Department of Gynaecology.
  • Ranjithakumaran H; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital.
  • Hand M; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital.
  • Peate M; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital.
  • Gillam L; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital.
  • McCarthy M; Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital.
  • Super L; School of Population and Global Health.
  • McQuillan S; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne.
  • Drew S; Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville.
  • Jayasinghe Y; Monash Children's Cancer Centre, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Orme L; Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatric Gynecology, University of Calgary, The Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 40(3): e133-e139, 2018 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29481385
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Fertility preservation (FP) discussions in children with cancer presents unique challenges due to ethical considerations, lack of models-of-care, and the triadic nature of discussions. This study evaluated a fertility toolkit for clinicians involved in FP discussions with pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients and parents. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A survey-based, longitudinal study of clinicians at The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne involved in FP discussions undertaken at 3 time-points 2014, alongside an education session for baseline assessment of oncofertility practices (survey 1); after each toolkit use to evaluate case-specific implementation (survey 2); 2016, to evaluate impact on clinical practice (survey 3).

RESULTS:

Fifty-nine clinicians completed survey 1. Over 66% reported baseline dissatisfaction with the existing FP system; 56.7% were not confident in providing up-to-date information. Only 34.5% "often" or "always" provided verbal information; 14.0% "often" or "always" provided written information. Survey 2 was completed after 11 consultations. All clinicians were satisfied with the discussions and outcomes using the toolkit. Thirty-nine clinicians completed survey 3. Over 70% felt confident providing up-to-date FP knowledge, 67.7% "often" or "always" provided verbal information, and 35.4% "often" or "always" provided written information.

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinicians desire improvement in FP practice. The toolkit provided significant perceived and actual benefits.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Preservação da Fertilidade / Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Sobreviventes de Câncer / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Assunto da revista: HEMATOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Preservação da Fertilidade / Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Sobreviventes de Câncer / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Assunto da revista: HEMATOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article