Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Closing the Referral Loop: an Analysis of Primary Care Referrals to Specialists in a Large Health System.
Patel, Malhar P; Schettini, Priscille; O'Leary, Colin P; Bosworth, Hayden B; Anderson, John B; Shah, Kevin P.
Afiliação
  • Patel MP; Duke University School of Medicine, 8 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. Malhar.Patel@duke.edu.
  • Schettini P; Duke University School of Medicine, 8 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • O'Leary CP; Duke University School of Medicine, 8 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Bosworth HB; Duke University School of Medicine, 8 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Anderson JB; Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Shah KP; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(5): 715-721, 2018 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29532299
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Ideally, a referral from a primary care physician (PCP) to a specialist results in a completed specialty appointment with results available to the PCP. This is defined as "closing the referral loop." As health systems grow more complex, regulatory bodies increase vigilance, and reimbursement shifts towards value, closing the referral loop becomes a patient safety, regulatory, and financial imperative. OBJECTIVE/

DESIGN:

To assess the ability of a large health system to close the referral loop, we used electronic medical record (EMR)-generated data to analyze referrals from a large primary care network to 20 high-volume specialties between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016. MAIN

MEASURES:

The primary metric was documented specialist appointment completion rate. Explanatory analyses included documented appointment scheduling rate, individual clinic differences, appointment wait times, and geographic distance to appointments. KEY

RESULTS:

Of the 103,737 analyzed referral scheduling attempts, only 36,072 (34.8%) resulted in documented complete appointments. Low documented appointment scheduling rates (38.9% of scheduling attempts lacked appointment dates), individual clinic differences in closing the referral loop, and significant differences in wait times and distances to specialists between complete and incomplete appointments drove this gap. Other notable findings include high variation in wait times among specialties and correlation between high wait times and low documented appointment completion rates.

CONCLUSIONS:

The rate of closing the referral loop in this health system is low. Low appointment scheduling rates, individual clinic differences, and patient access issues of wait times and geographic proximity explain much of the gap. This problem is likely common among large health systems with complex provider networks and referral scheduling. Strategies that improve scheduling, decrease variation among clinics, and improve patient access will likely improve rates of closing the referral loop. More research is necessary to determine the impact of these changes and other potential driving factors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Encaminhamento e Consulta / Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Encaminhamento e Consulta / Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos