Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Training of polyp staging systems using mixed imaging modalities.
Wimmer, Georg; Gadermayr, Michael; Kwitt, Roland; Häfner, Michael; Tamaki, Toru; Yoshida, Shigeto; Tanaka, Shinji; Merhof, Dorit; Uhl, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Wimmer G; University of Salzburg, Department of Computer Sciences, Jakob Haringerstrasse 2, 5020 Salzburg, Austria. Electronic address: gwimmer@cosy.sbg.ac.at.
  • Gadermayr M; RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben 55, 52056 Aachen, Germany.
  • Kwitt R; University of Salzburg, Department of Computer Sciences, Jakob Haringerstrasse 2, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
  • Häfner M; St. Elisabeth Hospital, Landstraßer Hauptstraße 4a, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
  • Tamaki T; Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan.
  • Yoshida S; Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan.
  • Tanaka S; Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan.
  • Merhof D; RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben 55, 52056 Aachen, Germany.
  • Uhl A; University of Salzburg, Department of Computer Sciences, Jakob Haringerstrasse 2, 5020 Salzburg, Austria. Electronic address: uhl@cosy.sbg.ac.at.
Comput Biol Med ; 102: 251-259, 2018 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29773226
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In medical image data sets, the number of images is usually quite small. The small number of training samples does not allow to properly train classifiers which leads to massive overfitting to the training data. In this work, we investigate whether increasing the number of training samples by merging datasets from different imaging modalities can be effectively applied to improve predictive performance. Further, we investigate if the extracted features from the employed image representations differ between different imaging modalities and if domain adaption helps to overcome these differences.

METHOD:

We employ twelve feature extraction methods to differentiate between non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions. Experiments are performed using four different classifier training strategies, each with a different combination of training data. The specifically designed setup for these experiments enables a fair comparison between the four training strategies.

RESULTS:

Combining high definition with high magnification training data and chromoscopic with non-chromoscopic training data partly improved the results. The usage of domain adaptation has only a small effect on the results compared to just using non-adapted training data.

CONCLUSION:

Merging datasets from different imaging modalities turned out to be partially beneficial for the case of combining high definition endoscopic data with high magnification endoscopic data and for combining chromoscopic with non-chromoscopic data. NBI and chromoendoscopy on the other hand are mostly too different with respect to the extracted features to combine images of these two modalities for classifier training.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reconhecimento Automatizado de Padrão / Pólipos do Colo / Diagnóstico por Computador Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Comput Biol Med Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reconhecimento Automatizado de Padrão / Pólipos do Colo / Diagnóstico por Computador Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Comput Biol Med Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article