Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Whole-body biomechanical differences between limbs exist 9 months after ACL reconstruction across jump/landing tasks.
King, Enda; Richter, Chris; Franklyn-Miller, Andy; Daniels, Katherine; Wadey, Ross; Moran, Ray; Strike, Siobhan.
Afiliação
  • King E; Sports Medicine Research Department, Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Richter C; Department of Life Sciences, Roehampton University, London, UK.
  • Franklyn-Miller A; Sports Medicine Research Department, Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Daniels K; Sports Medicine Research Department, Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Wadey R; Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Moran R; Sports Medicine Research Department, Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Strike S; Queen's School of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 28(12): 2567-2578, 2018 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29972874
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies examining jump tasks after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have focused on performance measures without examining joint kinematic and kinetic variables. The aim of this study was to identify differences in biomechanical and performance measures between limbs across tests 9 months after surgery. METHODS: Four jump tests (double-leg drop jump (DLDJ), single-leg drop jump (SLDJ), single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) and hurdle hop (HH)) were carried out on 156 male subjects in a 3D motion capture laboratory 9 months after surgery. Statistical parametric mapping was used to identify differences in jump performance and biomechanical variables between limbs. RESULTS: Biomechanical measures were lower on the ACLR side across all four tests for internal knee valgus moment (effect size 0.78-0.96, knee internal rotation angle 0.59-0.73, and 0.60-0.83), respectively. [corrected].The timing of the largest difference between limbs was not at the same % stance between variables within a test or for any variable across tests. Large ES differences were observed in performance in the SLDJ (ES 0.73-0.81; LSI 78%) and small differences in the SLHD (ES 0.36; LSI 94%) between the limbs. CONCLUSION: Findings highlighted biomechanical differences between limbs which are consistent across jump tasks suggesting insufficient rehabilitation at 9 months post surgery. Results indicate that the SLDJ may identify greater performance deficits between limbs than SLHD, which may over-estimate rehabilitation status.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Amplitude de Movimento Articular / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Joelho / Tornozelo Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Med Sci Sports Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Amplitude de Movimento Articular / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Joelho / Tornozelo Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Med Sci Sports Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda