Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comprehensive gene expression profiling identifies distinct and overlapping transcriptional profiles in non-specific interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Cecchini, Matthew J; Hosein, Karishma; Howlett, Christopher J; Joseph, Mariamma; Mura, Marco.
Afiliação
  • Cecchini MJ; Department of Pathology, Western University, London, Canada.
  • Hosein K; Division of Respirology, London Health Science Centre, Victoria Hospital, Western University, 800 Commissioners Road East Room E6-203, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada.
  • Howlett CJ; Department of Pathology, Western University, London, Canada.
  • Joseph M; Department of Pathology, Western University, London, Canada.
  • Mura M; Division of Respirology, London Health Science Centre, Victoria Hospital, Western University, 800 Commissioners Road East Room E6-203, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada. marco.mura@lhsc.on.ca.
Respir Res ; 19(1): 153, 2018 Aug 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30111332
BACKGROUND: The clinical-radiographic distinction between idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) is challenging. We sought to investigate the gene expression profiles of IPF and NSIP vs. normal controls. METHODS: Gene expression from explanted lungs of patients with IPF (n = 22), NSIP (n = 10) and from normal controls (n = 11) was assessed. Microarray analysis included Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM), Ingenuity Pathway, Gene-Set Enrichment and unsupervised hierarchical clustering analyses. Immunohistochemistry and serology of proteins of interest were conducted. RESULTS: NSIP cases were significantly enriched for genes related to mechanisms of immune reaction, such as T-cell response and recruitment of leukocytes into the lung compartment. In IPF, in contrast, these involved senescence, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, myofibroblast differentiation and collagen deposition. Unlike the IPF group, NSIP cases exhibited a strikingly homogenous gene signature. Clustering analysis identified a subgroup of IPF patients with intermediate and ambiguous expression of SAM-selected genes, with the interesting upregulation of both NSIP-specific and senescence-related genes. Immunohistochemistry for p16, a senescence marker, on fibroblasts differentiated most IPF cases from NSIP. Serial serum levels of periostin, a senescence effector, predicted clinical progression in a cohort of patients with IPF. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive gene expression profiling in explanted lungs identifies distinct transcriptional profiles and differentially expressed genes in IPF and NSIP, supporting the notion of NSIP as a standalone condition. Potential gene and protein markers to discriminate IPF from NSIP were identified, with a prominent role of senescence in IPF. The finding of a subgroup of IPF patients with transcriptional features of both NSIP and senescence raises the hypothesis that "senescent" NSIP may represent a risk factor to develop superimposed IPF.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transcrição Gênica / Perfilação da Expressão Gênica / Pneumonias Intersticiais Idiopáticas / Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transcrição Gênica / Perfilação da Expressão Gênica / Pneumonias Intersticiais Idiopáticas / Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá