Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between support vector machine and deep learning, machine-learning technologies for detecting epiretinal membrane using 3D-OCT.
Sonobe, Tomoaki; Tabuchi, Hitoshi; Ohsugi, Hideharu; Masumoto, Hiroki; Ishitobi, Naohumi; Morita, Shoji; Enno, Hiroki; Nagasato, Daisuke.
Afiliação
  • Sonobe T; Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan. t.sonobe@tsukazaki-eye.net.
  • Tabuchi H; Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan.
  • Ohsugi H; Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan.
  • Masumoto H; Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan.
  • Ishitobi N; Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan.
  • Morita S; Research Group of Intelligent Cybernetics and Computer Science Graduate School of Engineering, University of Hyogo, Himeji, Japan.
  • Enno H; Rist Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nagasato D; Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan.
Int Ophthalmol ; 39(8): 1871-1877, 2019 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30218173
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

In this study, we compared deep learning (DL) with support vector machine (SVM), both of which use three-dimensional optical coherence tomography (3D-OCT) images for detecting epiretinal membrane (ERM).

METHODS:

In total, 529 3D-OCT images from the Tsukazaki hospital ophthalmology database (184 non-ERM subjects and 205 ERM patients) were assessed; 80% of the images were divided for training, and 20% for test as follows 423 training (non-ERM 245, ERM 178) and 106 test (non-ERM 59, ERM 47) images. Using the 423 training images, a model was created with deep convolutional neural network and SVM, and the test data were evaluated.

RESULTS:

The DL model's sensitivity was 97.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 87.7-99.9%] and specificity was 98.0% (95% CI, 89.7-99.9%), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.993 (95% CI, 0.993-0.994). In contrast, the SVM model's sensitivity was 97.6% (95% CI, 87.7-99.9%), specificity was 94.2% (95% CI, 84.0-98.7%), and AUC was 0.988 (95% CI, 0.987-0.988).

CONCLUSION:

DL model is better than SVM model in detecting ERM by using 3D-OCT images.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retina / Acuidade Visual / Membrana Epirretiniana / Imageamento Tridimensional / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica / Máquina de Vetores de Suporte / Aprendizado de Máquina Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retina / Acuidade Visual / Membrana Epirretiniana / Imageamento Tridimensional / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica / Máquina de Vetores de Suporte / Aprendizado de Máquina Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão