Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
DNA transfer in forensic science: A review.
van Oorschot, Roland A H; Szkuta, Bianca; Meakin, Georgina E; Kokshoorn, Bas; Goray, Mariya.
Afiliação
  • van Oorschot RAH; Office of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, 31 Forensic Drive, Macleod 3085, Australia; School of Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Australia. Electronic address: roland.vanoorschot@police.vic.gov.au.
  • Szkuta B; Office of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, 31 Forensic Drive, Macleod 3085, Australia; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong 3220, Australia.
  • Meakin GE; UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK; UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK.
  • Kokshoorn B; Division Biological Traces, Netherlands Forensic Institute, P.O. Box 24044 2490 AA, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Goray M; Biometrics Division, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, 31 Forensic Drive, Macleod 3085, Australia.
Forensic Sci Int Genet ; 38: 140-166, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30399535
Understanding the variables impacting DNA transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery (DNA-TPPR) has become increasingly relevant in investigations of criminal activities to provide opinion on how the DNA of a person of interest became present within the sample collected. This review considers our current knowledge regarding DNA-TPPR to assist casework investigations of criminal activities. There is a growing amount of information available on DNA-TPPR to inform the relative probabilities of the evidence given alternative scenarios relating to the presence or absence of DNA from a specific person in a collected sample of interest. This information should be used where relevant. However, far more research is still required to better understand the variables impacting DNA-TPPR and to generate more accurate probability estimates of generating particular types of profiles in more casework relevant situations. This review explores means of achieving this. It also notes the need for all those interacting with an item of interest to have an awareness of DNA transfer possibilities post criminal activity, to limit the risk of contamination or loss of DNA. Appropriately trained forensic practitioners are best placed to provide opinion and guidance on the interpretation of profiles at the activity level. However, those requested to provide expert opinion on DNA-related activity level issues are often insufficiently trained to do so. We advocate recognition of DNA activity associated expertise to be distinct from expertise associated with the identification of individuals. This is to be supported by dedicated training, competency testing, authorisation, and regular fit for purpose proficiency testing. The possibilities for experts to report on activity-related issues will increase as our knowledge increases through further research, access to relevant data is enhanced, and tools to assist interpretations are better exploited. Improvement opportunities will be achieved sooner, if more laboratories and agencies accept the need to invest in these aspects as well as the training of practitioners.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tato / DNA Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Forensic Sci Int Genet Assunto da revista: GENETICA / JURISPRUDENCIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tato / DNA Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Forensic Sci Int Genet Assunto da revista: GENETICA / JURISPRUDENCIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article