Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aerial and terrestrial-based monitoring of channel erosion, headcutting, and sinuosity.
Cox, Samuel E; Doncaster, Dennis L; Godfrey, Peter E; Londe, Michael D.
Afiliação
  • Cox SE; USDI Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State Office, 5353 Yellowstone Rd, Cheyenne, WY, 82009, USA. secox@blm.gov.
  • Doncaster DL; USDI Bureau of Land Management, Rock Springs Field Office, 280 Hwy 191, Rock Springs, WY, 82901, USA.
  • Godfrey PE; USDI Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office, 1 North Central Ave, Suite 800, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
  • Londe MD; USDI Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State Office, 5353 Yellowstone Rd, Cheyenne, WY, 82009, USA.
Environ Monit Assess ; 190(12): 717, 2018 Nov 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30421328
ABSTRACT
Headcuts are points of accelerated channel erosion that frequently have ecological consequences. A particularly large and dynamic headcut in southwest Wyoming has affected natural and anthropogenic resources for decades. To better understand and address this issue, we undertook a review of the headcut's upstream retreat, followed by photogrammetric monitoring of the present condition for erosion monitoring. Aerial photography shows the Bitter Creek headcut retreated > 200 m upstream in 68 years (1948-2016) at ~ 1.4 m year-1. Following installation of a concrete slab structure in the mid-1970s, headcut retreat slowed to ~ 0.5 m year-1. Channel sinuosity downstream of the headcut is greater than upstream, which we attribute to the presence of the headcut, given that there are no major changes in valley geometry, geology, or soils through this reach. Both aerial and terrestrial-based image platforms were used to collect stereo imagery and create 3D photogrammetric models of the headcut in 2016. From these two models, we measured soil loss downstream of the headcut at ~ 126 m3 m-1 valley length. Since 1954, soil loss within the channel has been ~ 98 m3 year-1 or ~871 t ha-1 year-1since then. Models created from aerial- and terrestrial-based images differed in volumetric estimates by 2%, indicating that either method could be used for this type of monitoring. The ground-based imagery model showed more detail, especially on vertical and overhanging surfaces, while the aerial imagery model produced a more realistic orthomosaic and efficiently covered a larger area. Ground-based image acquisition took longer and was more costly per unit area, but is an efficient method for small project areas, or areas where aerial imagery cannot be safely or practically acquired. Historical imagery and photogrammetric modeling proved very useful in elucidating stream dynamics associated with this large, dynamic headcut.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Solo / Fotografação / Monitoramento Ambiental Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Environ Monit Assess Assunto da revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Solo / Fotografação / Monitoramento Ambiental Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Environ Monit Assess Assunto da revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos