Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Clinical Decision Support-Generated Report Cards Versus Real-Time Alerts on Primary Care Provider Guideline Adherence for Low Back Pain Outpatient Lumbar Spine MRI Orders.
Zafar, Hanna M; Ip, Ivan K; Mills, Angela M; Raja, Ali S; Langlotz, Curtis P; Khorasani, Ramin.
Afiliação
  • Zafar HM; 1 Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Silverstein 1, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
  • Ip IK; 2 Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Mills AM; 3 Department of Radiology, Brigham nd Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Raja AS; 4 Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
  • Langlotz CP; 2 Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Khorasani R; 3 Department of Radiology, Brigham nd Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 212(2): 386-394, 2019 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30476451
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the type of feedback on evidence-based guideline adherence influences adult primary care provider (PCP) lumbar spine (LS) MRI orders for low back pain (LBP). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Four types of guideline adherence feedback were tested on eight tertiary health care system outpatient PCP practices no feedback during baseline (March 1, 2012-October 4, 2012), randomization by practice to either clinical decision support (CDS)-generated report cards comparing providers to peers only or real-time CDS alerts at order entry during intervention 1 (February 6, 2013-December 31, 2013), and both feedback types for all practices during intervention 2 (January 14, 2014-June 20, 2014, and September 4, 2014-January 21, 2015). International Classification of Disease codes identified LBP visits (excluding Medicare fee-for-service). The primary outcome of the likelihood of LS MRI order being made on the day of or 1-30 days after the outpatient LBP visit was adjusted by feedback type (none, report cards only, real-time alerts only, or both); patient age, sex, race, and insurance status; and provider sex and experience.

RESULTS:

Half of PCPs (54/108) remained for all three periods, conducting 9394 of 107,938 (8.7%) outpatient LBP visits. The proportion of LBP visits increased over the course of the study (p = 0.0001). In multilevel hierarchic regression, report cards resulted in a lower likelihood of LS MRI orders made the day of and 1-30 days after the visit versus baseline 38% (p = 0.009) and 37% (p = 0.006) for report cards alone, and 27% (p = 0.020) and 27% (p = 0.016) with alerts, respectively. Real-time alerts alone did not affect MRI orders made the day of (p = 0.585) or 1-30 days after (p = 0.650) the visit. No patient or provider variables were associated with LS MRI orders being generated on the day of or 1-30 days after the LBP visit.

CONCLUSION:

CDS-generated evidence-based report cards can substantially reduce outpatient PCP LS MRI orders on the day of and 1-30 days after the LBP visit. Real-time CDS alerts do not.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Coluna Vertebral / Padrões de Prática Médica / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Dor Lombar / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas / Prescrições / Assistência Ambulatorial / Tomada de Decisão Clínica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Coluna Vertebral / Padrões de Prática Médica / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Dor Lombar / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas / Prescrições / Assistência Ambulatorial / Tomada de Decisão Clínica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article