Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
Donnally, Chester J; McCormick, Johnathon R; Li, Deborah J; Maguire, James A; Barker, Grant P; Rush, Augustus J; Wang, Michael Y.
Afiliação
  • Donnally CJ; 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Hospital; and.
  • McCormick JR; Departments of2Education and.
  • Li DJ; Departments of2Education and.
  • Maguire JA; Departments of2Education and.
  • Barker GP; Departments of2Education and.
  • Rush AJ; 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Hospital; and.
  • Wang MY; 3Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 30(2): 279-288, 2018 11 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30497169
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to assess the impact of certain demographics, social media usage, and physician review website variables for spine surgeons across Healthgrades.com (Healthgrades), Vitals.com (Vitals), and Google.com (Google).METHODSThrough a directory of registered North American Spine Society (NASS) physicians, we identified spine surgeons practicing in Texas (107 neurosurgery trained, 192 orthopedic trained). Three physician rating websites (Healthgrades, Vitals, Google) were accessed to obtain surgeon demographics, training history, practice setting, number of ratings/reviews, and overall score (January 2, 2018-January 16, 2018). Using only the first 10 search results from Google.com, we then identified whether the surgeon had a website presence or an accessible social media account on Facebook, Twitter, and/or Instagram.RESULTSPhysicians with either a personal or institutional website had a higher overall rating on Healthgrades compared to those who did not have a website (p < 0.01). Nearly all spine surgeons had a personal or institutional website (90.3%), and at least 1 accessible social media account was recorded for 43.5% of the spine surgeons in our study cohort (39.5% Facebook, 10.4% Twitter, 2.7% Instagram). Social media presence was not significantly associated with overall ratings across all 3 sites, but it did significantly correlate with more comments on Healthgrades. In multivariable analysis, increasing surgeon age was significantly associated with a lower overall rating across all 3 review sites (p < 0.05). Neurosurgeons had higher overall ratings on Vitals (p = 0.04). Longer wait times were significantly associated with a lower overall rating on Healthgrades (p < 0.0001). Overall ratings from all 3 websites correlated significantly with each other, indicating agreement between physician ratings across different platforms.CONCLUSIONSLonger wait times, increasing physician age, and the absence of a website are indicative of lower online review scores for spine surgeons. Neurosurgery training correlated with a higher overall review score on Vitals. Having an accessible social media account does not appear to influence scores, but it is correlated with increased patient feedback on Healthgrades. Identification of ways to optimize patients' perception of care are important in the future of performance-based medicine.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Médico-Paciente / Satisfação do Paciente / Competência Clínica / Mídias Sociais / Neurocirurgiões Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg Spine Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Médico-Paciente / Satisfação do Paciente / Competência Clínica / Mídias Sociais / Neurocirurgiões Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosurg Spine Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article