Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of conservative treatment outcomes for proximal humeral epiphyseal fractures in patients of different ages.
Wei, Sheng-Wang; Shi, Zhan-Ying; Zhao, You-Ming; Wu, Hao; Hu, Ju-Zheng; Huang, Zhan-Zhu; Zhao, Jin-Min.
Afiliação
  • Wei SW; Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 530021, Nanning, Guangxi Province, China.
  • Shi ZY; Department of Orthopaedics, liuzhou workers Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi Province, China.
  • Zhao YM; Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Wu H; Department of Orthopaedics, liuzhou workers Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi Province, China.
  • Hu JZ; Department of Orthopaedics, liuzhou workers Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi Province, China.
  • Huang ZZ; Department of Orthopaedics, liuzhou workers Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi Province, China.
  • Zhao JM; Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 530021, Nanning, Guangxi Province, China. zhaojinmingtg@126.com.
Orthopade ; 48(2): 119-124, 2019 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30574675
BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that excellent therapeutic outcomes can be achieved with conservative treatment of proximal humeral epiphyseal fractures in patients younger than 11 years old; however, the outcomes of conservative treatment for children older than 11 years are controversial. To address this problem, this study compared outcomes of conservative treatment for proximal humeral epiphyseal fractures in pediatric patients of different ages. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups for comparative purposes based on age. Group I consisted of 34 patients who were less than 11 years old (average age: 5 years) and group II included 21 patients who were 11 years of age or older (average age: 14 years). Patients in both groups underwent conservative treatment and follow-up examination, where they first were examined with X­radiography for assessment of deformity, fracture union and loss of reduction. At the final follow-up after 2 years, patients were assessed by an interview and a detailed physical examination including the assessment of shoulder function using the Constant-Murley score. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the grading scale of varus deformity between the two groups (P > 0.05) after immediate postreduction X­radiography; however, there were significant differences in the grading scale of varus deformity between group I and group II at the 2­year follow-up (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the Constant-Murley score and arm length discrepancy (P > 0.05) at final follow-up examinations. CONCLUSION: In general, the results suggested that the outcomes, as measured with radiographs, for both older and young children were comparable after immediate postreduction roentgenograms. For long-term follow-up there was a difference between the two groups and the degree of angulation and displacement might be associated with treatment outcomes for older children. Thus, these factors should be considered when treating and evaluating the outcomes for older children.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ombro / Fraturas do Ombro / Tratamento Conservador Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Orthopade Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ombro / Fraturas do Ombro / Tratamento Conservador Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Orthopade Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China