Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of clinical benefit from treatment with mepolizumab for patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
Steinfeld, Jonathan; Bradford, Eric S; Brown, Judith; Mallett, Stephen; Yancey, Steven W; Akuthota, Praveen; Cid, Maria C; Gleich, Gerald J; Jayne, David; Khoury, Paneez; Langford, Carol A; Merkel, Peter A; Moosig, Frank; Specks, Ulrich; Weller, Peter F; Wechsler, Michael E.
Afiliação
  • Steinfeld J; Respiratory TAU & Flexible Discovery Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pa.
  • Bradford ES; Respiratory Therapeutic Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  • Brown J; Research and Development, Immuno-Inflammation TAU, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
  • Mallett S; Research & Development, Statistics, Programming and Data Standards, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
  • Yancey SW; Respiratory Therapeutic Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  • Akuthota P; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.
  • Cid MC; Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Gleich GJ; Departments of Dermatology and Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Jayne D; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Khoury P; Human Eosinophil Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
  • Langford CA; Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Center for Vasculitis Care and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Merkel PA; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
  • Moosig F; Rheumazentrum, Schleswig-Holstein Mitte, Neumünster, Germany.
  • Specks U; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
  • Weller PF; Divisions of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
  • Wechsler ME; Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo. Electronic address: wechslerm@njhealth.org.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 143(6): 2170-2177, 2019 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30578883
BACKGROUND: In a recent phase III trial (NCT02020889) 53% of mepolizumab-treated versus 19% of placebo-treated patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) achieved protocol-defined remission. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate post hoc the clinical benefit of mepolizumab in patients with EGPA using a comprehensive definition of benefit encompassing remission, oral glucocorticoid (OGC) dose reduction, and EGPA relapses. METHODS: The randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial recruited patients with relapsing/refractory EGPA receiving stable OGCs (prednisolone/prednisone, ≥7.5-50 mg/d) for 4 or more weeks. Patients received 300 mg of subcutaneous mepolizumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Clinical benefit was defined post hoc as follows: remission at any time (2 definitions used), 50% or greater OGC dose reduction during weeks 48 to 52, or no EGPA relapses. The 2 remission definitions were Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score of 0 plus OGC dose of 4 mg/d or less (remission 1/clinical benefit 1) or 7.5 mg/d or less (remission 2/clinical benefit 2). Clinical benefit was assessed in all patients and among subgroups with a baseline blood eosinophil count of less than 150 cells/µL, baseline OGC dosage of greater than 20 mg/d, or weight of greater than 85 kg. RESULTS: With mepolizumab versus placebo, 78% versus 32% of patients experienced clinical benefit 1, and 87% versus 53% of patients experienced clinical benefit 2 (both P < .001). Significantly more patients experienced clinical benefit 1 with mepolizumab versus placebo in the blood eosinophil count less than 150 cells/µL subgroup (72% vs 43%, P = .033) and weight greater than 85 kg subgroup (68% vs 23%, P = .005); in the OGC greater than 20 mg/d subgroup, results were not significant but favored mepolizumab (60% vs 36%, P = .395). CONCLUSION: When a comprehensive definition of clinical benefit was applied to data from a randomized controlled trial, 78% to 87% of patients with EGPA experienced benefit with mepolizumab.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Granulomatose com Poliangiite / Granuloma Eosinófilo / Eosinófilos / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Granulomatose com Poliangiite / Granuloma Eosinófilo / Eosinófilos / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article