Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hippocampal Interaction With Area 25, but not Area 32, Regulates Marmoset Approach-Avoidance Behavior.
Wallis, Chloe U; Cockcroft, Gemma J; Cardinal, Rudolf N; Roberts, Angela C; Clarke, Hannah F.
Afiliação
  • Wallis CU; Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DY, UK.
  • Cockcroft GJ; Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DY, UK.
  • Cardinal RN; Department of Psychiatry, Box 189, Level E4, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 OQQ, UK.
  • Roberts AC; Liaison Psychiatry Service, Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Box 190, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 OQQ, UK.
  • Clarke HF; Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DY, UK.
Cereb Cortex ; 29(11): 4818-4830, 2019 12 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30796800
ABSTRACT
Affective disorders are associated with increased sensitivity to negative feedback that influences approach-avoidance decision making. Although neuroimaging studies of these disorders reveal dysregulation in primate cingulate areas 25 and 32 and the anterior hippocampus (aHipp), the causal involvement of these structures and their interaction in the primate brain is unknown. We therefore investigated the effects of localized pharmacological manipulations of areas 25 and 32 and/or the aHipp of the marmoset monkey on performance of an anxiolytic-sensitive instrumental decision-making task in which an approach-avoidance conflict is created by pairing a response with reward and punishment. During control infusions animals avoided punishment, but this bias was reduced by increasing glutamate release within the aHipp or area 32, and inactivation or 5-HT1a antagonism within area 25. Conversely, increasing glutamate release in area 25 enhanced punishment avoidance but, in contrast to previous reports, area 32 and aHipp inactivations had no effect. Simultaneous inactivation or 5-HT1a antagonism within area 25, but not area 32, abolished the reduced punishment avoidance seen after increasing aHipp glutamate. Besides providing causal evidence that these primate areas differentially regulate negative feedback sensitivity, this study links the decision-making deficits in affective disorders to aberrant aHipp-area 25 circuit activity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Punição / Recompensa / Aprendizagem da Esquiva / Comportamento de Escolha / Córtex Pré-Frontal / Tomada de Decisões / Hipocampo Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Cereb Cortex Assunto da revista: CEREBRO Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Punição / Recompensa / Aprendizagem da Esquiva / Comportamento de Escolha / Córtex Pré-Frontal / Tomada de Decisões / Hipocampo Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Cereb Cortex Assunto da revista: CEREBRO Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido