Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The prevalence of venous thromboembolism in rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hayes, Joshua W; Ryan, Éanna J; Boland, Patrick A; Creavin, Ben; Kelly, Michael E; Beddy, David.
Afiliação
  • Hayes JW; Department of Surgery, James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland. joshuawphayes@hotmail.com.
  • Ryan ÉJ; Department of Surgery, James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Boland PA; Department of Surgery, James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Creavin B; Department of Surgery, James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kelly ME; Department of Surgery, James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Beddy D; Department of Surgery, James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 34(5): 849-860, 2019 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30824975
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) following rectal surgery is a significant and preventable cause of morbidity and mortality, yet the true prevalence is not well established. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the available literature and determined its prevalence following rectal surgery.

METHODS:

A systematic review assessed the prevalence of VTE following rectal surgery. In addition, we evaluated whether subgroups (open vs. minimally invasive or benign vs. malignant resections) impacted on its prevalence or rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE).

RESULT:

Thirty-eight studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. The aggregate prevalence of VTE following rectal surgery was 1.25% (95% CI 0.86-1.63), with DVT and PE occurring in 0.68% (95% CI 0.48-0.89) and 0.57% (95% CI 0.47-0.68) of patients. VTE following cancer and benign resection was 1.59% (95% CI 0.60-1.23 and 1.5% (95% CI 0.89-2.12) respectively. The prevalence of VTE in patients having minimally invasive resection was lower than those having open surgery [0.58% (16/2770) vs. 2.22% (250/11278); RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.86].

CONCLUSION:

This review observed that there is sparse evidence on prevalence of VTE following rectal surgery. It provides aggregated data and analysis of available literature, showing overall prevalence is low, especially in those having minimally invasive procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reto / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Tromboembolia Venosa Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reto / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Tromboembolia Venosa Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda