Thromboelastometry as a diagnostic tool in mild bleeding disorders: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Major guidelines emphasise the potential of visco-elastic methods to overcome the limitations of conventional laboratory assays in the peri-operative setting. Their sensitivity regarding mild bleeding disorders (MBDs), the most common bleeding disorders in the general population, is however unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of thromboelastometry for diagnosis of MBD. DESIGN: A single-centre prospective cohort study. SETTING: Haematology outpatient unit of a tertiary general hospital in Central Switzerland. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients referred over a 32-month period with a suspected bleeding disorder were included and thromboelastometry was conducted using a ROTEM delta (EXTEM, INTEM and FIBTEM). Diagnostic work-up was performed according to current guidelines including the ISTH bleeding assessment tool (ISTH BAT). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distribution of clotting time (CT) and maximum clot firmness (MCF) results in relation to the presence of MBD. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen patients were assessed; the median [IQR] age was 39 years [28 to 57]; 151 patients were women (70%). MBD was diagnosed in 97 patients (45%), no MBD was found in 100 patients (46%) and a systemic disorder recognised in 20 patients (9%). Presence of MBD was not associated with a significant difference in thromboelastometry variables (0.2 s in CT EXTEM, 95% CI -2.3 to 2.7; -0.2 mm in MCF EXTEM, 95% CI -1.8 to 1.5; -0.7 s in CT INTEM, 95% CI -12.6 to 11.2; 0.6 mm in MCF INTEM, 95% CI -1.2 to 1.3; 0.8 mm in MCF FIBTEM, 95% CI -1.6 to 1.4) and most results were within the established reference ranges. CONCLUSION: Our data did not support the use of thromboelastometry as a diagnostic tool in patients with MBD.