Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
; 95(1): 20-24, 2019 Sep.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31129008
Diagnostic tests for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) lack either specificity (nucleic acid amplification tests) or sensitivity (enzyme immunoassays; EIAs). The performance of the Singulex Clarity® C. diff toxins A/B assay was compared to cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay. Testing was also performed using an EIA for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and C. difficile toxins A and B (C. Diff Quik Chek Complete®), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (BD MAX™ Cdiff Assay), and 2 multistep algorithms: algorithm 1 (discordant GDH/toxin results arbitrated by PCR) and algorithm 2 (PCR-positive samples tested with toxin EIA). The Clarity assay and PCR both had 97% sensitivity, while specificity was 100% for Clarity and 79% for PCR. Algorithm 1 yielded 41% discordant results, and both toxin EIA and algorithm 2 had 58% sensitivity. Median toxin concentrations, as measured by the Clarity C. difficile toxin assay, were 3590, 11.5, 0.4, and 0â¯pg/mL for GDH+/toxin+, GDH+/toxin-/PCR+, GDH+/toxin-/PCR-, and GDH-/toxin- samples, respectively (Pâ¯<â¯0.001). The Clarity assay may offer a single-test solution for CDI.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Proteínas de Bactérias
/
Toxinas Bacterianas
/
Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa
/
Imunoensaio
/
Clostridioides difficile
/
Técnicas Bacteriológicas
/
Enterotoxinas
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
Ano de publicação:
2019
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Estados Unidos