Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.
Sandlund, Johanna; Mills, Ray; Griego-Fullbright, Christen; Wagner, Aaron; Estis, Joel; Bartolome, Amelita; Almazan, Anna; Tam, Stanley; Biscocho, Sheryl; Abusali, Salina; Nolan, Niamh; Bishop, Jeffrey J; Todd, John; Young, Stephen.
Afiliação
  • Sandlund J; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Mills R; TriCore Reference Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
  • Griego-Fullbright C; TriCore Reference Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
  • Wagner A; TriCore Reference Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
  • Estis J; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Bartolome A; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Almazan A; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Tam S; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Biscocho S; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Abusali S; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Nolan N; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Bishop JJ; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Todd J; Singulex, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA.
  • Young S; TriCore Reference Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Department of Pathology, The University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA. Electronic address: Steve.Young@tricore.org.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 95(1): 20-24, 2019 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31129008
Diagnostic tests for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) lack either specificity (nucleic acid amplification tests) or sensitivity (enzyme immunoassays; EIAs). The performance of the Singulex Clarity® C. diff toxins A/B assay was compared to cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay. Testing was also performed using an EIA for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and C. difficile toxins A and B (C. Diff Quik Chek Complete®), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (BD MAX™ Cdiff Assay), and 2 multistep algorithms: algorithm 1 (discordant GDH/toxin results arbitrated by PCR) and algorithm 2 (PCR-positive samples tested with toxin EIA). The Clarity assay and PCR both had 97% sensitivity, while specificity was 100% for Clarity and 79% for PCR. Algorithm 1 yielded 41% discordant results, and both toxin EIA and algorithm 2 had 58% sensitivity. Median toxin concentrations, as measured by the Clarity C. difficile toxin assay, were 3590, 11.5, 0.4, and 0 pg/mL for GDH+/toxin+, GDH+/toxin-/PCR+, GDH+/toxin-/PCR-, and GDH-/toxin- samples, respectively (P < 0.001). The Clarity assay may offer a single-test solution for CDI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas de Bactérias / Toxinas Bacterianas / Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa / Imunoensaio / Clostridioides difficile / Técnicas Bacteriológicas / Enterotoxinas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas de Bactérias / Toxinas Bacterianas / Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa / Imunoensaio / Clostridioides difficile / Técnicas Bacteriológicas / Enterotoxinas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos