Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cell segmentation methods for label-free contrast microscopy: review and comprehensive comparison.
Vicar, Tomas; Balvan, Jan; Jaros, Josef; Jug, Florian; Kolar, Radim; Masarik, Michal; Gumulec, Jaromir.
Afiliação
  • Vicar T; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, Brno, CZ-61600, Czech Republic.
  • Balvan J; Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic.
  • Jaros J; Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic.
  • Jug F; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 656/123, Brno, CZ-612 00, Czech Republic.
  • Kolar R; Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno, CZ-62500, Czech Republic.
  • Masarik M; International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Pekarska 664/53, Brno, CZ-65691, Czech Republic.
  • Gumulec J; Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstr. 108, Dresden, DE-01307, Germany.
BMC Bioinformatics ; 20(1): 360, 2019 Jun 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31253078
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Because of its non-destructive nature, label-free imaging is an important strategy for studying biological processes. However, routine microscopic techniques like phase contrast or DIC suffer from shadow-cast artifacts making automatic segmentation challenging. The aim of this study was to compare the segmentation efficacy of published steps of segmentation work-flow (image reconstruction, foreground segmentation, cell detection (seed-point extraction) and cell (instance) segmentation) on a dataset of the same cells from multiple contrast microscopic modalities.

RESULTS:

We built a collection of routines aimed at image segmentation of viable adherent cells grown on the culture dish acquired by phase contrast, differential interference contrast, Hoffman modulation contrast and quantitative phase imaging, and we performed a comprehensive comparison of available segmentation methods applicable for label-free data. We demonstrated that it is crucial to perform the image reconstruction step, enabling the use of segmentation methods originally not applicable on label-free images. Further we compared foreground segmentation methods (thresholding, feature-extraction, level-set, graph-cut, learning-based), seed-point extraction methods (Laplacian of Gaussians, radial symmetry and distance transform, iterative radial voting, maximally stable extremal region and learning-based) and single cell segmentation methods. We validated suitable set of methods for each microscopy modality and published them online.

CONCLUSIONS:

We demonstrate that image reconstruction step allows the use of segmentation methods not originally intended for label-free imaging. In addition to the comprehensive comparison of methods, raw and reconstructed annotated data and Matlab codes are provided.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fracionamento Celular / Microscopia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Bioinformatics Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: República Tcheca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fracionamento Celular / Microscopia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Bioinformatics Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: República Tcheca