Prominent FLAIR Vascular Hyperintensity Is a Predictor of Unfavorable Outcomes in Non-thrombolysed Ischemic Stroke Patients With Mild Symptoms and Large Artery Occlusion.

ABSTRACT

Background and objective: The aim was to evaluate the clinical significance of prominent fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH) on the prognosis of mild acute ischemic stroke with middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Methods: We recruited consecutive stroke patients with initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores ≤5 and MCA occlusion on magnetic resonance angiography within 24 h of stroke onset. Prominent distal FVH was defined as an extension to more than one-third of the MCA territory. We compared clinical outcomes between prominent and non-prominent FVH groups in patients who had and had not received reperfusion therapy. Results: Of 112 participants [43 women; median age, 67 years [Interquartile range, 54-79]], prominent FVH was identified in 80 (71.4%). For 75 patients who had not received reperfusion therapy, the prominent FVH group had a more unfavorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >1) at 3 months than the non-prominent FVH group (44.4 vs. 15.0%, P = 0.029). In multivariate analysis, a higher NIHSS score [odd ratio [OR] = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.41; P = 0.006], proximal MCA occlusion [OR = 7.31; 95% CI, 1.68-31.9; P = 0.008], and prominent FVH [OR = 5.49; 95% CI, 1.29-23.4; P = 0.021], were independently associated with an unfavorable outcome. There was no association between prominent FVH and the clinical outcome in the reperfusion therapy group. Conclusions: For acute stroke patients with mild symptoms and MCA occlusion who do not receive reperfusion therapy, prominent FVH and proximal MCA occlusion may be independent predictors of an unfavorable outcome.