Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of 90-Day Restart of Renal Replacement Therapy after Discontinuation of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, a Prospective Multicenter Study.
Stads, Susanne; Kant, K Merijn; de Jong, Margriet F C; de Ruijter, Wouter; Cobbaert, Christa M; Betjes, Michiel G H; Gommers, Diederik; Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M.
Afiliação
  • Stads S; Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, s.stads@erasmusmc.nl.
  • Kant KM; Department of Intensive Care, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, s.stads@erasmusmc.nl.
  • de Jong MFC; Department of Intensive Care, Amphia Hospital Breda, Breda, The Netherlands.
  • de Ruijter W; Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Cobbaert CM; Department of Intensive Care, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
  • Betjes MGH; Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Gommers D; Department of Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Oudemans-van Straaten HM; Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Blood Purif ; 48(3): 243-252, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31330511
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Restart of renal replacement therapy (RRT) after initial discontinuation of continuous RRT (CRRT) is frequently needed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether renal markers after discontinuation of CRRT can predict restart of RRT within 90 days.

METHODS:

Prospective multicenter observational study in 90 patients, alive, still on the intensive care unit at day 2 after discontinuation of CRRT for expected recovery with urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) available. The endpoint was restart of RRT within 90 days. Baseline and renal characteristics were compared between outcome groups no restart or restart of RRT. Logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic curve analysis were performed to determine the best predictive and discriminative variables.

RESULTS:

Restart of RRT was needed in 32/90 (36%) patients. Compared to patients not restarting, patients restarting RRT demonstrated a higher day 2 urinary NGAL, lower day 2 urine output, and higher incremental creatinine ratio (day 2/0). In multivariate analysis, only incremental creatinine ratio (day 2/0) remained independently associated with restart of RRT (OR 5.28, 95% CI 1.45-19.31, p = 0.012). The area under curve for incremental creatinine ratio to discriminate for restart of RRT was 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.88). The optimal cutoff was 1.49 (95% CI 1.44-1.62).

CONCLUSION:

In this prospective multicenter study, incremental creatinine ratio (day 2/0) was the best predictor for restart of RRT. Patients with an incremental creatinine ratio at day 2 of 1.5 times creatinine at discontinuation are likely to need RRT within 90 days. These patients might benefit from nephrological follow-up.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia de Substituição Renal / Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Blood Purif Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia de Substituição Renal / Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Blood Purif Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article