Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized Trial of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Versus Capecitabine in Older Women With Early Breast Cancer: 10-Year Update of the CALGB 49907 Trial.
Muss, Hyman B; Polley, Mei-Yin C; Berry, Donald A; Liu, Heshan; Cirrincione, Constance T; Theodoulou, Maria; Mauer, Ann M; Kornblith, Alice B; Partridge, Ann H; Dressler, Lynn G; Cohen, Harvey J; Kartcheske, Patricia A; Perez, Edith A; Wolff, Antonio C; Gralow, Julie R; Burstein, Harold J; Mahmood, Ahmad A; Sutton, Linda M; Magrinat, Gustav; Parker, Barbara A; Hart, Ronald D; Grenier, Debjani; Hurria, Arti; Jatoi, Aminah; Norton, Larry; Hudis, Clifford A; Winer, Eric P; Carey, Lisa.
Afiliação
  • Muss HB; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Polley MC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Berry DA; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Liu H; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Cirrincione CT; Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • Theodoulou M; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Mauer AM; Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Kornblith AB; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA.
  • Partridge AH; Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Dressler LG; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Cohen HJ; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Kartcheske PA; Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • Perez EA; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Wolff AC; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
  • Gralow JR; University of Washington Seattle Cancer Alliance, Seattle, WA.
  • Burstein HJ; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA.
  • Mahmood AA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Sutton LM; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Magrinat G; Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, NC.
  • Parker BA; Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
  • Hart RD; Harold Alfond Center for Cancer Care, Augusta, ME.
  • Grenier D; St Boniface General Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Hurria A; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
  • Jatoi A; Deceased.
  • Norton L; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Hudis CA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Winer EP; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Carey L; Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA.
J Clin Oncol ; 37(26): 2338-2348, 2019 09 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31339827
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Older women with breast cancer remain under-represented in clinical trials. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B 49907 trial focused on women age 65 years and older. We previously reported the primary analysis after a median follow-up of 2.4 years. Standard adjuvant chemotherapy showed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival compared with capecitabine. We now update results at a median follow-up of 11.4 years. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients age 65 years or older with early breast cancer were randomly assigned to either standard adjuvant chemotherapy (physician's choice of either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin) or capecitabine. An adaptive Bayesian design was used to determine sample size and test noninferiority of capecitabine. The primary end point was RFS.

RESULTS:

The design stopped accrual with 633 patients at its first sample size assessment. RFS remains significantly longer for patients treated with standard chemotherapy. At 10 years, in patients treated with standard chemotherapy versus capecitabine, the RFS rates were 56% and 50%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; P = .03); breast cancer-specific survival rates were 88% and 82%, respectively (HR, 0.62; P = .03); and overall survival rates were 62% and 56%, respectively (HR, 0.84; P = .16). With longer follow-up, standard chemotherapy remains superior to capecitabine among hormone receptor-negative patients (HR, 0.66; P = .02), but not among hormone receptor-positive patients (HR, 0.89; P = .43). Overall, 43.9% of patients have died (13.1% from breast cancer, 16.4% from causes other than breast cancer, and 14.1% from unknown causes). Second nonbreast cancers occurred in 14.1% of patients.

CONCLUSION:

With longer follow-up, RFS remains superior for standard adjuvant chemotherapy versus capecitabine, especially in patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. Competing risks in this older population dilute overall survival benefits.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Capecitabina / Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Caledônia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Capecitabina / Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Caledônia