Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Care experiences among dually enrolled older adults with cancer: SEER-CAHPS, 2005-2013.
Lines, Lisa M; Cohen, Julia; Halpern, Michael T; Smith, Ashley Wilder; Kent, Erin E.
Afiliação
  • Lines LM; RTI International, 307 Waverley Oaks Rd, Suite 101, Waltham, MA, 02452, USA. llines@rti.org.
  • Cohen J; University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA. llines@rti.org.
  • Halpern MT; RTI International, 307 Waverley Oaks Rd, Suite 101, Waltham, MA, 02452, USA.
  • Smith AW; Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Room 3E4342, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
  • Kent EE; Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr., Room 3E4342, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9762, USA.
Cancer Causes Control ; 30(10): 1137-1144, 2019 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31422490
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Given the associations between poverty and poorer outcomes among older adults with cancer, we sought to understand the effects of dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid-as a marker of poverty-on self-reported care experiences among seniors diagnosed with cancer.

METHODS:

Retrospective, observational study using cancer registry, Medicare claims, and care experience survey data (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER]-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems [CAHPS®]) for a national sample of fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees aged 65 or older. We included people with one incident primary, malignant cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2011, surveyed within 2 years after diagnosis (n = 9,800; 995 dual enrollees). Medicare CAHPS measures included 5 global ratings and 3 composite scores.

RESULTS:

After adjustment for potential confounders, people with cancer histories who were dually enrolled were significantly more likely to report better experiences than non-duals on 2 measures (Medicare/their health plan adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.87; prescription drug plan [PDP] aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS:

Dual enrollees with cancer reported better experiences than Medicare-only enrollees in terms of their health plan (Medicare FFS or Medicare Advantage) and their PDP. Better ratings among dually enrolled beneficiaries suggest possible divergence between health outcomes and care experiences, warranting additional investigation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Medicaid / Satisfação do Paciente / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Causes Control Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Medicaid / Satisfação do Paciente / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Causes Control Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos