Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of standard treatment guidelines in India.
Koli, Paresh Girdharlal; Kshirsagar, Nilima A; Shetty, Yashashri C; Mehta, Dhvani; Mittal, Yashaswini; Parmar, Urwashi.
Afiliação
  • Koli PG; Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College & King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Kshirsagar NA; National Chair of Clinical Pharmacology, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
  • Shetty YC; Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College & King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Mehta D; Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi, India.
  • Mittal Y; Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi, India.
  • Parmar U; Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College & King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Indian J Med Res ; 149(6): 715-729, 2019 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31496524
ABSTRACT
Background &

objectives:

Standard treatment guidelines (STGs) are the cornerstone to therapeutics. Multiple agencies in India develop STGs. This systematic review was conducted to find out STGs available in India, evaluate if these were as per World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for STGs and compare these with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Information on legal authority and responsibility for formulating STGs was also sought.

Methods:

PRISMA guidelines were followed. Publications from PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for STGs using terms 'Standard Treatment Guidelines AND India'. Data from STGs were compiled in excel as per the WHO and authors' criteria for STGs and compared with NICE guidelines.

Results:

PubMed and Google Scholar search provided 56 publications (out of 1695 search results) mentioning 27 STGs. Google search and replies from authors led us 36 STGs, totalling to 63 STGs. No STG mentioned any specific period of revision, eight STGs were not evidence-based, 55 had some Indian references, 48 STGs were for single disease and the remaining multi-disease, three STGs did not include diagnostic criteria, 16 STGs did not give prescribing information of recommended treatment and 16 STGs provide no referral criteria for patients. Fifty five STGs did not mention level of health care. While NICE is a single legal authority in England and guidelines are as per WHO recommendations for STGs, in India although Acts and rules do not vest authority, National Health Systems Resource Center is generally designated responsible for STGs. Interpretation &

conclusions:

In India, although there are multiple STGs developed by various authorities and professionals for the same conditions, these fulfil WHO recommendations only partially. Authority with statutory duty collaborating with professional organizations, a standard methodology for adopting international guidelines, Indian data for evidence base, attention to local needs will help in developing better STGs and their acceptance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Referência / Guias como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Med Res Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Referência / Guias como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Med Res Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia