Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for colorectal cancer significantly vary by anatomic site.
Demb, Joshua; Earles, Ashley; Martínez, María Elena; Bustamante, Ranier; Bryant, Alex K; Murphy, James D; Liu, Lin; Gupta, Samir.
Afiliação
  • Demb J; Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Earles A; Department of Research, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Martínez ME; Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Bustamante R; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
  • Bryant AK; Department of Research, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Murphy JD; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Liu L; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Gupta S; Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol ; 6(1): e000313, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31523441
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To conduct an anatomic site-specific case-control study of candidate colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors.

DESIGN:

Case-control study of US veterans with >1 colonoscopy during 1999-2011. Cases had cancer registry-identified CRC at colonoscopy, while controls were CRC free at colonoscopy and within 3 years of colonoscopy. Primary outcome was CRC, stratified by anatomic site proximal, distal, or rectal. Candidate risk factors included age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, height, diabetes, smoking status, and aspirin exposure summarised by adjusted ORs and 95% CIs.

RESULTS:

21 744 CRC cases (n=7017 rectal; n=7039 distal; n=7688 proximal) and 612 646 controls were included. Males had significantly higher odds relative to females for rectal cancer (OR=2.84, 95% CI 2.25 to 3.58) than distal cancer (OR=1.84, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.24). Relative to whites, blacks had significantly lower rectal cancer odds (OR=0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95), but increased distal (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.37) and proximal odds (OR=1.62, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.72). Diabetes prevalence was more strongly associated with proximal (OR=1.29, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.36) than distal (OR=1.15, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.22) or rectal cancer (OR=1.12, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.19). Current smoking was more strongly associated with rectal cancer (OR=1.81, 95% CI 1.68 to 1.95) than proximal cancer (OR=1.53, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.65) or distal cancer (OR=1.46, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.57) compared with never smoking. Aspirin use was significantly more strongly associated with reduced rectal cancer odds (OR=0.71, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.76) than distal (OR=0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.90) or proximal (OR=0.91, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.95).

CONCLUSION:

Candidate CRC risk factor associations vary significantly by anatomic site. Accounting for site may enable better insights into CRC pathogenesis and cancer control strategies.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos