Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of a clinical score in predicting pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Kopljar, Mario; Coklo, Miran; Krstacic, Antonija; Krstacic, Goran; Jelec, Vjekoslav; Zovak, Mario; Pavic, Roman; Kondza, Goran.
Afiliação
  • Kopljar M; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Center "Sestre Milosrdnice", Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Coklo M; Medical Faculty Osijek, University "Josip Juraj Strossmayer", Osijek, Croatia.
  • Krstacic A; Institute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Krstacic G; Medical Faculty Osijek, University "Josip Juraj Strossmayer", Osijek, Croatia.
  • Jelec V; University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Zovak M; Clinical Hospital of Traumatology, University Hospital Centre "Sestre Milosrdnice", Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Pavic R; Medical Faculty Osijek, University "Josip Juraj Strossmayer", Osijek, Croatia.
  • Kondza G; University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.
Acta Chir Belg ; 121(1): 30-35, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31535593
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most severe complications after cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy, with mortality as high as 30%. Risk scores may help predict the risk of POPF. Multiple external validations substantially improve generalized clinical acceptability of a scoring system.

AIM:

The aim of this study was to externally validate previously described fistula risk score in the prediction of clinically relevant POPF.

METHODS:

All patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for any indication during a 5-year period were prospectively analyzed. A total of 132 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Of the 132 patients, 44 (33.3%) developed pancreatic fistula, including 12.9% biochemical leaks, 7.6% grade B fistula, and 12.9% grade C fistula. Cut-off point of 4.5 was determined to best separate patients who developed clinically relevant POPF with area under curve of 78% (p = .00003). Sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of clinically relevant POPF with the cut-off value of 4.5 was 70.4 and 74.3%, respectively. Positive predictive value with cut-off value 4.5 was 57.8%, and negative predictive value was 83.4%.

CONCLUSION:

Fistula risk score identified low risk patients with false negative rate of 16.6%. Further external validation studies on large cohorts of patients and with wide case-mix may enable additional refinements of the score model.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fístula Pancreática / Pancreaticoduodenectomia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Chir Belg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Croácia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fístula Pancreática / Pancreaticoduodenectomia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Chir Belg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Croácia