Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The router bit extraction technique for removing a well-fixed humeral stem in revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Kang, Jason R; Logli, Anthony L; Tagliero, Adam J; Sperling, John W.
Afiliação
  • Kang JR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Logli AL; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Tagliero AJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Sperling JW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Bone Joint J ; 101-B(10): 1280-1284, 2019 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31564150
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

A number of methods have been described to remove a well-fixed humeral implant as part of revision shoulder arthroplasty. These include the use of cortical windows and humeral osteotomies. The router bit extraction technique uses a high-speed router bit to disrupt the bone-implant interface. The implant is then struck in a retrograde fashion with a square-tip impactor and mallet. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and frequency of the different techniques needed for the removal of a well-fixed humeral stem in revision shoulder arthroplasty. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Between 2010 and 2018, 288 revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures requiring removal of a well-fixed humeral component were carried out at a tertiary referral centre by a single surgeon. The patient demographics, indications for surgery, and method of extraction were collected.

RESULTS:

Of the 288 revisions, 284 humeral stems (98.6%) were removed using the router bit extraction technique alone. Four humeral stems (1.39%) required an additional cortical window. Humeral osteotomy was not necessary in any procedure. Most of the humeral stems removed (78.8%) were cementless. Of the four humeral stems that required a cortical window, three involved removal of a hemiarthroplasty. Two were cemented and two were cementless.

CONCLUSION:

The router bit extraction technique removed a well-fixed humeral component in a very high proportion of patients (98.6%). This method allows surgeons to avoid more invasive approaches involving a cortical window or humeral osteotomy, and their associated complications. Cite this article Bone Joint J 2019;101-B1280-1284.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Falha de Prótese / Remoção de Dispositivo / Hemiartroplastia / Artroplastia do Ombro Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Bone Joint J Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Falha de Prótese / Remoção de Dispositivo / Hemiartroplastia / Artroplastia do Ombro Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Bone Joint J Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos