Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Educational attainment in childhood cancer survivors: a meta-analysis.
Saatci, Defne; Thomas, Andrew; Botting, Beverley; Sutcliffe, Alastair G.
Afiliação
  • Saatci D; General and Adolscent Paediatric Unit, Institute of Child Health, London, UK defne.saatci.16@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Thomas A; General and Adolscent Paediatric Unit, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
  • Botting B; General and Adolscent Paediatric Unit, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
  • Sutcliffe AG; General and Adolscent Paediatric Unit, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Arch Dis Child ; 105(4): 339-346, 2020 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31601570
OBJECTIVE: To assess differences across educational outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer (CCS) compared with peers. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Medline, EMBASE, ERIC, CINAHL and PsycInfo from inception to 1st August 2018. Any peer reviewed, comparative study with a population of any survivor of childhood cancer, from high-economy countries, reporting outcomes on educational attainment, were selected. RESULTS: 26 studies representing 28 434 CCS, 17 814 matched controls, 6582 siblings and six population studies from 11 high-income countries, which have similar access to education and years of mandatory schooling as reported by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, were included. CCS were more likely to remain at compulsory level (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.43) and less likely to complete secondary (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.0) and tertiary level education (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.98). They were more likely to require special educational needs (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.91 to 3.20). Subgroup analyses revealed that survivors, irrespective of central nervous system (CNS) involvement, were less likely to progress onto secondary level compared with cancer-free peers (OR 1.77. 95% CI 1.46 to 2.15; OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.42, respectively). This, however, changed at tertiary level where those with CNS involvement continued to perform worse (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.68) but those without appeared to perform similarly to their peers (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with controls, we have elucidated significant differences in educational attainment in survivors. This is sustained across different countries, making it an international issue. CNS involvement plays a key role in educational achievement. Clinicians, teachers and policymakers should be made aware of differences and consider advocating for early educational support for survivors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sucesso Acadêmico / Sobreviventes de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch Dis Child Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sucesso Acadêmico / Sobreviventes de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch Dis Child Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article