Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal Elbow Positions for Identification of the Radial Collateral Ligament Using Ultrasonography.
Park, Chul-Hyun; Kim, Beom Suk; Lee, Jae Hyun; Chung, Sun Gun.
Afiliação
  • Park CH; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim BS; Chung-Ang University College of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JH; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Chung SG; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
PM R ; 12(7): 671-678, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31671237
BACKGROUND: The standard position for examining the lateral elbow with ultrasonography is an "extended" or "slightly flexed" position. However, because the radial collateral ligament (RCL) is more deeply attached on the lateral epicondyle than the common extensor tendon, an anisotropic artifact of the RCL could be observed in the conventional positions, making it difficult to fully visualize the RCL. OBJECTIVES: To determine optimal elbow positions for accurate identification of the RCL and to explore the relevant landmarks in ultrasonography. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty healthy elbows of 20 participants. METHODS: The RCL was evaluated using ultrasonography in six elbow flexion positions (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 140°). The relative depth, defined as the depth of the capitellum subtracted by the depth of the radial head under ultrasonography, was measured at each angle. The rates of successful identification of ultrasonographic landmarks for localizing the RCL were calculated. After ultrasonography, the optimal elbow position for identifying the RCL was determined by group consensus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Relative depth between radial head and capitellum, rates of successful identification of ultrasonographic landmarks, and consensus-based determination of the optimal angle. RESULTS: The relative depth significantly decreased with an increase in the flexion angle (P for trend <.001), approaching zero at the angles of 90° and 120°. The rates of successful identification of the superior tubercle, hyperechogenic line, and anterior and posterior tubercles were 100%, 100%, 90%, and 80%, respectively. In the group consensus, the 90° and 120° flexion angles were selected with the highest frequency (90%; 36/40). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that elbow flexion at 90° or 120° is optimal for visualization of the RCL with the least possibility of anisotropy under ultrasonography, suggesting that the elbow should be flexed considerably beyond the conventional extended or slightly flexed position.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia / Ligamentos Colaterais / Articulação do Cotovelo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PM R Assunto da revista: MEDICINA FISICA / REABILITACAO / TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia / Ligamentos Colaterais / Articulação do Cotovelo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PM R Assunto da revista: MEDICINA FISICA / REABILITACAO / TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article